Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Examination of Environmental Health Hazards Essay
Examination, Environmental, Health, Hazards, Essay
Environmental health hazards are anything in the environment that endangers human health and life. Most environmental pollutants have repercussions on human health in various ways. Chemicals in most pollutants like in the pesticides can move through air, soil, and water hence causing fatal impacts on human life.
According to the effects of pesticides, they cause respiratory diseases, damage to reproductive organs, among other severe consequences that can lead to deaths. Several pieces of research relating to the effects of environmental pollution on human life are incorporated to validate the insights of this study.
Purposively, this paper discusses ecological health related to pesticides, heavy metals, or radiation that is impacting your community and the health effects associated with these hazardous substances. Therefore, the following context presents different articles that review insights into the topic, as mentioned earlier in the project.
According to the previous studies on the topic, Sepúlveda, Schluep, Renaud, Streicher, Kuehr, Hagelüken & Gerecke (2010) reiterate that places where people heavily use chemicals like pesticides, then their lives are in danger.
Prominently, this study indicates that environmental and human health threat, which is backed up by other studies that have examined the impact of concentrations of these compounds in humans and other organisms. In most countries, the legal and illegal trade of waste electrical and electronic equipment leads to harmful recycling methods that, in turn, affect the overall ecosystem hindering human life.
Another article on the effects of pesticides on human life suggests that these chemicals lead to respiratory problems. When people use pesticides in the farms, they end up posing respiratory diseases due to strong scent from the substances. Also, these chemicals affect the reproductive organs in humans, especially to men (Moline et al., 2000).
Importantly, once people consume these chemicals and metal particles, they end up affecting their reproductive organs. Therefore, these articles advocate for people to use the right recycling processes when dealing with such products.
Rehman, Fatima, Waheed, and Akash (2018) maintain that consumption of contaminated drinking water and the resulting health issues may include cardiovascular disorders, neuronal damage, renal injuries, and risk of cancer and diabetes. Most of the metals in drinking water include arsenic, cadmium, nickel, mercury, chromium, zinc, and lead (Rehman et al., 2018).
When people are exposed to these metals and chemicals, their lives end up being exposed to health, as mentioned earlier, problems that might lead to deaths. For instance, one of the fatal disorders is cardiovascular disorders.
Therefore, according to Eckelman & Sherman (2018), people should avoid taking such contaminants in their lives to prevent any form of health complication. Through taking contaminated water, the level of mortality in the world has increased; hence environmental control measures should be placed to reduce the death rates.
Vandali and Biradar (2018) maintain that environmental is an essential aspect of human life hence should be handled with great care to reduces its pollution. This article focuses on creating awareness regarding ecological health problems. Emphasizing on this article, all the sources of the toxics as mentioned earlier are explained hence throughout the article, and people get the relevant information on how to reduce the effects by avoiding the mentioned substances.
Government and non-governmental organizations should impose several measures to mitigate the impact of the materials, as discussed above, such as the establishment of environmental conservation measures. Conclusively, all the articles provide insights that people should refrain from ecological pollution to avoid health hazards.
References
Eckelman, M. J., & Sherman, J. D. (2018). Estimated global disease burden from US health care sector greenhouse gas emissions. American journal of public health, 108(S2), S120-S122.
Moline, J. M., Golden, A. L., Bar-Chama, N., Smith, E., Rauch, M. E., Chapin, R. E., … & Landrigan, P. J. (2000). Exposure to hazardous substances and male reproductive health: a research framework. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108(9), 803-813.
Rehman, K., Fatima, F., Waheed, I., & Akash, M. S. H. (2018). Prevalence of exposure of heavy metals and their impact on health consequences. Journal of cellular biochemistry, 119(1), 157-184.
Sepúlveda, A., Schluep, M., Renaud, F. G., Streicher, M., Kuehr, R., Hagelüken, C., & Gerecke, A. C. (2010). A review of the environmental fate and effects of hazardous substances released from electrical and electronic equipments during recycling: Examples from China and India. Environmental impact assessment review, 30(1), 28-41.
Vandali, V., & Biradar, R. B. (2018). Impact of Environment on Health: Nurse’ s Role. Journal of Clinical and Nursing Research, 2(3).
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/