Examination of Corporate Governance and Strategic Management Issues

December 8, 2022

Examination of Corporate Governance and Strategic Management Issues

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Examination of Corporate Governance and Strategic Management Issues

[Order Now]

Answering the following questions in detailed paragraph format. Please use your PowerPoint slides and other professional reading resources (internet research) to answer the following questions. Each response should be a minimum of 150 words. Support your responses using cited research in APA format.

Chapter 4

Explain the evolution of corporate governance. What problems developed? What are the current trends?
Explain how governance failures such as Enron and the global financial crisis could happen. How might they be avoided?
Discuss the pros and cons of the shareholder-primacy and director-primacy models of corporate governance. Which do you prefer and why?

Chapter 5

Identify the steps involved in the strategic management process.
What is the difference between integrated reporting and a social performance report?
What is social entrepreneurship and how is it related to the bottom of the pyramid (BOP)?
What are the major ways in which public affairs might be incorporated into every managerial job? Rank them in terms of what you think their impact might be.

Chapter 6

Following the approach indicated in Figure 6-1, identify a new issue category not listed in Figure 2. Identify several examples of crises that have occurred in recent years under each issue category.
Identify a crisis that has occurred in your life or in the life of someone you know, and briefly explain it in terms of the four crisis stages: prodromal, acute, chronic, and resolution.
Research the impacts on business organizations of the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the scandals of the early to mid-2000s. What have been successful and unsuccessful examples of crisis management that have come out of this research? Is terrorism a likely crisis for which business may prepare? How does preparation for terrorism (which comes from without) compare with preparation for ethical scandals (which come from within)?

Rubric

Case Study (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcome. Understanding of Concepts and Terms

Responses show the student’s understanding of concepts and terms

10 Pts

Exemplary

Masterful demonstration of understanding of concepts and terms

8 Pts

Accomplished

Skillful demonstration of understanding of concepts and terms

6 Pts

Beginning

Minimal demonstration of understanding of concepts and terms

0 Pts

Not Evident

No demonstration of understanding of concepts and terms

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcome. Utilizing Chapter Concepts & Readings to Analyze Case

Presented accurate & relevant information, appeared knowledgeable about the case studies assigned and the topic discussed, offered strategies for dealing with the problems identified in the case studies

10 Pts

Exemplary

Masterful application of chapter concepts and readings to analyze case

8 Pts

Accomplished

Skillful application of chapter concepts and readings to analyze case

6 Pts

Beginning

Minimal application of chapter concepts and readings to analyze case

0 Pts

Not Evident

No application of chapter concepts to analyze case

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeRule Applicatin/Analysi s

Analysis was provided for each question

10 Pts

Exemplary

All questions are answered and provide a masterful demonstration of an understanding of issues related to organizational ethics course learning outcomes.

8 Pts

Accomplished

All questions are answered and provide a skillful demonstration of an understanding of issues related to organizational ethics course learning outcomes.

6 Pts

Beginning

Some questions are not answered. Those that are answered provide little demonstration of an understanding of issues related to organizational ethics course learning outcomes.

0 Pts

Not Evident

No questions are answered. No demonstration of an understanding of issues related to organizational ethics course learning outcomes.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcome. Writing

All key facts are recorded and organized in a neat and orderly fashion â paragraph form with proper punctuation, document demonstrates excellent APA formatting skills

10 Pts

Exemplary

Masterful attention to grammar, punctuation, and spelling. All sources are critically reviewed, documented and formatted following standard practices of the field (APA)

8 Pts

Accomplished

Skillful attention to grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Most sources are critically reviewed and documented following standard practices of the field (APA)

6 Pts

Beginning

Minimal attention to grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Sources meet the minimum requirements for being critically reviewed and documented following standard practices of the field (APA)

0 Pts

Not Evident

No attention to grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Insufficient sources and/or insufficient quality, critical review and documentation. Standard practices of the field are not followed.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcome. Application of learned material

Response shows the student’s capacity to apply learned material to new scenarios

10 Pts

Exemplary

Masterful application of learned material to new scenarios

8 Pts

Accomplished

Skillful application of learned material to new scenarios

6 Pts

Beginning

Minimal application of learned material to new scenarios

0 Pts

Not Evident

No application of learned material to new scenarios

10 pts

[Order Now]

Examination of Corporate Governance and Strategic Management Issues

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.