Evolution, Singapore, Hedging, Strategy

December 20, 2022

Evolution, Singapore, Hedging, Strategy

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Evolution, Singapore, Hedging, Strategy

II-A-iii-1) Binding Enagement, need to show Singapore’s binding engagement policy toward China from 2009-2017. Binding Engagement is Singapore’s effort to enmesh China into both bilateral and regional institutions. You would need to list out some major developments during the period, and wrap up with the core that guides or pattern that appeared in that period.

II-A-iii-2) Singapore’s Binding Engagement policies toward China from 2017-present. You would also need to list out some major efforts that Singapore made trying to enmesh China into bilateral and regional institutions. You would also need to list out some major developments during the period, and wrap up with the core that guides or pattern that appeared in that period.You should aim to show that Singapore’s effort to bring China into institutions is stronger than before. Potential thing to mention can be: ASEAN-CHina maritime exercise, and draft of code of conduct over SCS in ASEAN.

II-B-iii-1) Singapore’s Binding enagement policies toward the US form 2009-2017. You would also need to list out some major efforts that Singapore made trying to enmesh the US into bilateral and regional institutions. You would also need to list out some major developments during the period, and wrap up with the core that guides or pattern that appeared in that period. Potential thing to talk about can be: TPP

II-B-iii-2) Singapore’s binding enagement policies toward the US from 2017-present. list out some major efforts that Singapore made trying to enmesh the US into bilateral and regional institutions. You would also need to list out some major developments during the period, and wrap up with the core that guides or pattern that appeared in that period. You should aim to show that Singapore’s effort to bring US into institutions is stronger than before (ie. in 2009-2017).

II-A-iv-1): Singapore’s dominance denial policy toward China from 2009-2017. Dominance denial is A policy designed to minimize geopolitical risks of facing a preponderant hegemon by using non-military means to cultivate a balance of influence among the powers . The non-military means include: 1) involving other powers in regional affairs; 2) developing own resilience; 3) strengthening collective diplomatic clout. List our some efforts that Singapore made to 1)involve other powers in regional affairs, 2)developing own resilience, 3) strengthening diplomatic clout. Wrap up with the core that guides or pattern that appeared in that period. Potential thing to mention can be: Singapore’s attitude toward the south China sea issue (more supportive to US stance) and Taiwan problem.

II-A-iv-2): Singapore’s dominance deial policy toward China from 2017-present. List our some efforts that Singapore made to 1)involve other powers in regional affairs, 2)developing own resilience, 3) strengthening diplomatic clout. Wrap up with the core that guides or pattern that appeared in that period. Potential thing to mention can be: Singapore’s attitude toward the South CHina sea issue became more neutral. Singapore’s effort to construct itself as a smart nation. Singapore joining G 20…SIngapore trying to develop digital economy…You should aim to show that SIngapore’s use of dominance denial policy toward China is stronger than before (2009-2017)

II-B-iv-1): Singapore’s dominance denial policy toward the US from 2009-2017. Since 1) involve other powers in regional affairs 2)developing own resilience, 3) strengthening diplomatic clout. tend to overlap a lot with content in II-A-iv-1: you would need to mention the overlap at the beginning. All you need to do in this paragraph is to see if there is any US activities or policy or notion that Singapore rejects and trying to maintain its own voice. Potential thing to mention can be : Singapore’s rejection of US’s criticism over its human rights aspect. if Singapore did not show any rejection toward US’s policy/ notion/ acitivities, you can just mention that there is none

II-B-iv-2): Singapore’s dominance denial policy toward the US from 2009-2017. Since 1) involve other powers in regional affairs 2)developing own resilience, 3) strengthening diplomatic clout. tend to overlap a lot with content in II-A-iv-1: you would need to mention the overlap at the beginning. All you need to do in this paragraph is to see if there is any US activities or policy or notion that Singapore rejects and trying to maintain its own voice. Potential thing to talk about can be SIngapore’s reaction toward US’s 2019 country reports on Human rights practices: Singapore& Singapore’s rejection of US’s Indo-Pacific policy

[Order Now]

Evolution, Singapore, Hedging, Strategy

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.