Evidence imperatives of proof

January 24, 2023

Evidence imperatives of proof

Order Number	65765456457565645
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Evidence: imperatives of proof

Each paper must be between two and three pages and be double-spaced, with 12-point font and one-inch margins. Each paper is worth 5 points, for a total of 15 points for the three papers. The papers must be double-spaced, 12-point font and one-inch margins. The topics are posted below. You may choose more than one topic to meet the minimum page requirement. Make sure you identify which topic(s) you are addressing in the paper. Paper will be submitted on Canvas. If you use outside sources to address the topic, you must cite your work. Include a title page that includes your name (this does not count as one of your pages).

The Alford guilty plea permits a defendant to enter a guilty plea while at the same time protesting his innocence. Defendants seek to use an Alford plea when they want to avoid the greater sentence they generally face if they take their case to trial and lose. What do you see as the advantages and disadvantages of the courts allowing the use of the Alford Plea? If it was up to you, would you allow the Alford Plea to be used? Why or why not?

In everyday life, we judge other people not only by what they say but also to some extent by their appearances and their conduct. Do you feel that the demeanor of witnesses can and does affect the outcome of a trial? Why or why not? Do you feel it is possible for a witnesses’ demeanor to affect his/her credibility while testifying? If so, could not this be used as a tactic by either the prosecution or defense to strengthen their case?

Each adversary (prosecution and defense) seeks to present the facts that are most advantageous to its position. Each adversary also seeks to prevent and make it difficult for the opponent to do the same. Do you feel that this adversarial system may actually hinder the finding of the truth? Why or why not? Provide examples that support your decision.

[Order Now]

Evidence imperatives of proof

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.