Evidence-Based Practice Plan

December 21, 2022

Evidence-Based Practice Plan

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Evidence-Based Practice Plan

[Order Now]

Description

Assignment: Watch the 3 videos about implementing an evidence-based practice. Then find a current research article (<5 years) that discusses a new way of doing something that you do in your workplace. You are the unit manager. The parts of your paper should include:

1. An overview of the procedure or policy you want to change, and why it should be changed. Support your ideas with the article you found.

2. An explanation about the ideas that are in the 3 videos about how to implement change, and which of those ideas you would use.

3. An explanation of how you would implement and monitor this change. Would you have meetings? Informational sessions? Use coaches? Use selected staff to pilot the change? Implement gradually or all at once? This is not so much about the new procedure itself as it is about how you would introduce it. Support this with professional references about change.

4. A timeline for implementation of this change

5. An explanation of how you would evaluate the change process. Again, this isn’t about the procedure or policy itself, it’s about how you would evaluate how smoothly the change went.

Your submission should contain:

A title page and a reference page in APA style An introductory paragraph explaining the procedure or policy, why it should be changed, according to your chosen article.

The plan for the proposed change in outline form, including timelines, people to be involved, how it will be introduced, and how it will be evaluated.

A minimum of 750 words is required.

3 professional references are required. Correct spelling, grammar, and sentence structure is expected

Evidence-Based Practice Plan

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.