Evaluation of Ethics Research and Role-Playing Game

December 8, 2022

Evaluation of Ethics Research and Role-Playing Game

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Evaluation of Ethics Research and Role-Playing Game

[Order Now]

Author Note

I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to

Email:

Abstract

Begin typing your abstract here…

Ethics Assignment

Six Ways of Moral Reasoning

Deontological:

Teleological/Utilitarian:

Relativism:

Egoism:

Emotivism:

Virtue Theory:

Role-playing Game

DIRECTIONS: Read the following scenario and answer the questions. Be honest and answer as truthfully as you can. Simply highlight the answer on the course of action that you would probably take. At the end, transfer your answers to the Wrap-up sheet, and applying the key ethical and Biblical principles you have learned in this week’s materials, explain your responses.

An RFP for Your Agency

Imagine you are a senior account manager in a marketing or advertising agency near Los Angeles. It has been a tough couple of years and business has been slow. You have just received a RFP (Request for Proposal) from a large company in Chicago. If you land this account, it will mean large commissions, new opportunities for the agency and a secure future.

You are asked to lead the account team. You work tirelessly for several weeks, putting together what you hope is a wining pitch and campaign. If you don’t win the account, your future with the agency is in question.

The time has come to fly to Chicago to make your presentation. You board your flight, take your seat and begin the flight to Chicago.

During the flight, a couple of people sitting directly in front of you and dressed like executives are having a conversation. Based on what you can pick up, you realize they are from a competitive agency in Pasadena; they have also been asked to pitch the same account in Chicago and in fact, they are on the way to present to the client, probably before or after you.

Realizing these are your direct competitors for the account, what do you do? (Remember, you need this account very much)

Options:

Actively try to listen to their conversation… Any advantage you can gain could be helpful
Ignore the conversation completely, put in your ear-‐buds and listen to your iPod.

The plane lands in Chicago. You wait for a few minutes for the plane to clear. As you get up and start forward, you look down where the two competitors were sitting and see a full-‐color PowerPoint presentation, printed and bound sitting on the seat.

You realize it’s your competitor’s presentation that they’ve left behind. You look up and see they’ve already left the plan.

What do you do? Options:

Grab the presentation and put it into your laptop bag; it’s a valuable resource and could give you an edge and they left it behind.
Ignore the presentation and leave it there.

You grab a taxi to your hotel, and as you are checking in, you realize the team from the competitive agency is checking into the same hotel. They have not seen you or even know who you are. They check-‐in and send their bags up to their room and then head into the restaurant across the lobby.

What do you do? Options:

Head into the restaurant and get a table near your competitor to listen to what they might have to say; it’s an open and public area.
Head to another restaurant to have dinner and think about your presentation.

After dinner, you head to your room. As you round the corner, you see your competitors heading into their room; in fact, it’s next to yours. You enter your room and see that there is a door between the rooms for when people want to share rooms. You realize that you can almost hear them talking next door.

What do you do? Options:

Grab a glass from the counter and press it up to the door, capturing the conversation on the other side. Any information that can give you an edge is critical.
Turn on the TV, watch some news and try to relax for tomorrow.

Option 1: Listening on the plane

Your Answer: 1 2

Why:

Option 1: Pick up the PowerPoint Presentation

Your Answer: 1 2

Why:

Option 3: Listening at the restaurant

Your Answer: 1 2

Why:

Option 4: Listening through the hotel room door

Your Answer: 1 2

Why:

Examples of in-text APA formatting:

APA format for direct quotes: (Author’s last name, year of publication, p. x). For example: (Dunbar & Frederick, 2019, p. 34).

APA format for paraphrasing: (Author’s last name, year of publication). For example: (Dunbar & Frederick, 2019).

Example of a References page:

References Buckingham, M. (2005). What great managers do. Engineering Management Review, 33(2), 14-25. doi:10.1109/EMR.2005.26742 Butler, T., & Waldroop, J. (1999, September). The art of retaining your best people. Harvard Business Review, 77, 144-152. doi:10.1225/4282

Chapman, G. (n.d.). Understanding the five love languages. Retrieved from Focus on the Family: Retrieved from http://www.focusonthefamily.com/marriage/communication-and-conflict/learn-to-speak-your-spouses-love-language/understanding-the-five-love-languages

[Order Now]

Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2014). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations (11 ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage.

Halvorson, C. (2014, February 6). The ultimate guide to workplace motivation. Retrieved from wheniwork.com: http://wheniwork.com/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-workplace-motivation/

Lipman, V. (2013, 3 18). 5 easy ways to motivate – and demotivate – employees. Retrieved from www.Forbes.com: http://www.forbes.com/sites/victorlipman/2013/03/18/5-easy-ways-to-motivate-and-demotivate-employees/

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classis definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. doi:10.1006/ceps.199.1020 Sultan, S. (2012). Examining the job characteristics: A matter of employees’ work motivation and job satisfaction. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 22(2), 13-25.

Evaluation of Ethics Research and Role-Playing Game

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.