- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 757 528 8682
- support@standardwriter.com
evaluation-healthcare-information-technology
evaluation-healthcare-information-technology
|
Order Number |
2356897115 |
|
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
|
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
|
Format |
APA |
|
Academic Sources |
10 |
|
Page Count |
3-12 PAGE |
evaluation-healthcare-information-technology
Instructions/Descriptions
Fall 2019 NURS 4345
evaluation-healthcare-information-technology
PODCAST EVALUATION FORM
Web Source/URL that is not a Podcast will receive an assigned grade of zero (0).
Student Name:_________________________________________________________________
Course:_______________________________________________________________________
Instructor:_____________________________________________________________________
Web Source Title:_______________________________________________________________
Web Source URL:_______________________________________________________________
Date Visited Web Source:_________________________________________________________
Describe the main points presented in the Podcast. Discussion of main points demonstrates detail, depth, creativity and critical thinking. Podcasts on diagnosis, disease processes, nursing techniques, treatments or procedures are not appropriate for this assignment. A podcast that does not have a focus on healthcare information technology and/or informatics will have point deduction according to the rubric for this assignment. Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 200 words using APA Format with double-spacing of the text, 12-font, Times New Roman, and in-text citations that are also placed on the reference list.
Reference for Main Themes: Adapted from Harvard College
The evaluation form utilizes a 1 (Low) to 5 (High) scale. Please place a check mark in the column that is based on your perception of the Web source. There should only be one mark for each of the four areas. For example, if you assigned a value of “5” for each of the four criteria the total score would be 20.
PODCAST evaluation criteria
(Pullen & Silvers, 2018)
| CRITERIA | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 1. AuthoritY:and design:
a. The URL indicates that the podcast originates from a reputable source. B. The author or organization is a qualified authority that presents the information in a non-biased and non-discriminatory manner. C. The podcast is hosted by a moderator. D. Contact information is cited on the podcast website. E. The purpose of the podcast is clearly stated on the website. F. The terminology is appropriate for the audience. G. The creation and revision dates are cited on the website. H. The podcast is easily accessible and to use. I. The podcast allows viewers to download handouts or transcripts. J. The podcast design is appealing and presented in a professional manner. K. The podcast is easily readable without errors in grammar or spelling. L. The presenter’s voice is sufficient in volume and articulate in speech. M. The podcast is compliant with the American’s with Disability Act (ADA) through visual and auditory information. |
|||||
| Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 50 words using APA format with double-spacing of the text, 12-font, Times New Roman and in-text citations that are also placed on the reference list. |
| CRITERIA | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 2. evidence-based practice:
A. The podcast includes references from peer-reviewed journals, books, or professional organizations that are generally not older than five years. B. The podcast is relevant (Has value) in the education of nurses and other health professionals and the patient. C. The podcast advances the profession of nursing through evidence-based best practices. D. The podcast promotes safe, quality patient care. |
|||||
| Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 50 words using APA format with double-spacing of the text, 12-font, Times New Roman, and in-text citations that are also placed on the reference list. |
| CRITERIA | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 3. patient-centered care:
A. Patient values beliefs, and resources are addressed in the podcast. B. The podcast clearly presents that the patient is an integral member of the inter-professional team and takes an active role in their care. C. The podcast promotes shared decision-making between the patient and other health professionals. |
|||||
| Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 50 words using APA format with double-spacing of the text, 12-font, Times New Roman and in-text citations that are also placed on the reference list. |
| CRITERIA | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 4. teaching foundation:
A. The podcast promotes active engagement in the learning experiences. B. The podcast uses diverse teaching strategies to educate nurses and other health professionals, students, or patients. C. Diverse technologies are integrated into the podcast to promote learning. |
|||||
| Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 50 words using APA format with double-spacing of the text, 12-font, Times New Roman and in-text citations that are also placed on the reference list. |
TOTAL PODCAST EVALUATION
| TOTAL POINTS |
| Total possible points is 20. Rating based on the total possible points:
18-20: Excellent 16-17: Good 14-15: Fair 12-13: Poor < 12: Very poor Student Rating________ |
- Please describe in detail your personal evaluation of the Podcast by answering the following questions. Place your narrative responses on this form following each question. Do not create another form or document. Responses should be written in well-developed, concise and succinct paragraphs. Responses demonstrate effective preparation, critical thinking and are free from sentence structure errors, word choice errors and spelling/grammar/punctuation errors. Please refer to Scholarly Writing and APA Helpful Hints document located in the Syllabus tab. Each response is a minimum of 250 words excluding references. APA format should be used when responding to the questions with double-spacing of the text, 12-font, Times New Roman and in-text referencescitations that are also placed on the reference list.
- Three references are required for the Podcast Evaluation excluding the Podcast discussed. The APA 6th edition textbook will not be considered as a required reference for this assignment.
- More than three references are recommended for a higher grade for the Podcast Evaluation excluding the Podcast. Citations should be peer-reviewed, scholarly and professional. Citations should not be older than 5five years. Please refer to Scholarly Writing and APA Helpful Hints document located in the Syllabus tab.
- Would you recommend this Podcast to your peers, other healthcare providers and patients? (Address each one). Why or why not?
- How would you integrate the Podcast information into your own nursing practice?
Describe at least two ways that the Podcast is relevant to your nursing practice.
Revised: 7/16/2019 cs/rp; 8/5/2019 cs/rp
evaluation-healthcare-information-technology
