Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Description
Hello! Attached PDF of Bioethics Book to be used a reference Pg 238 other chapters cross reference. I am Pro Assisted Euthanasia if the patient has a terminal illness Please email or text me if any other info is needed. Below is the grading scale for this assignment Reading Response Guidelines You will be required to submit two short (3-page) responses to the required readings. You may pick any two of the readings assigned, as long as they are on separate topics. In your response, you should:
1) adequately explain what the author’s position is and how they defend it
2) reflect upon the strengths and weaknesses of the essay. There are 4 possible grades for the reading responses: Excellent
(A) Your response is well written, you adequately explain the author’s position in your own words, demonstrate an understanding of the arguments, and make several interesting points that contribute to the discussion. Satisfactory
(B-) Your response is fairly well written, you explain the author’s position your own words, demonstrate some understanding of the arguments, and raise at least one interest point that adds to the discussion. Unsatisfactory
(D) Your writing needs lots of improvement, you do not adequately explain the author’s position in your own words, demonstrate an understanding of the arguments, and fail to offer any interesting points of your own. Unacceptable
(F) Your response is barely legible, demonstrates serious misunderstandings of the readings, and fails to offer any analysis.
Grading Rubrics
Euthanasia-The Right to Die
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/or