Environmental Economics and Sustenance Economy Assignment

November 26, 2022

Environmental Economics and Sustenance Economy Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Environmental, Economics, Sustenance, Economy, Assignment

[Order Now]

Environmental economics Assignment 1

Select some component of the economy concerning water. Describe that sector, discuss price, demand, and availability. You should identify the aspects of components with the terms we have studied (such as socialism, capitalism, free market economy, command and control economy, sustenance economy, public goods, scarcity, utility). Chapters 1 and 2 in Harris should give you a foundation for this discussion, but you will need to explore your chosen water sector, and of course any other source of economic theory you choose.

For example, you could discuss the bottled water market, price and supply of water used in oil drilling, treatment of waste water, irrigation water in California or local municipal drinking water.

Remember you are writing this as an economist, so describe the system (who makes it, who buys it), discuss price (is it a variable market driven price or set by someone), availability (how scarce is it), and allocation rules (who can buy and sell).

I expect your paper (body) to be 3+ pages (double spaced, 12-point font). Also include a title page, and reference page with at least 5 references (neither of which count toward your page minimum). Figures do not count toward page length, but will count toward the grade you receive.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Environmental Economics and Sustenance Economy Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.