Environmental Decision Making Stems Essay Assignment

Environmental Decision Making Stems Essay Assignment

Instructions/Descriptions

Environmental Decision Making Stems Essay Assignment

[Order Now]

“Sustainability” is an oft-cited buzzword in today’s society. We see and hear it and its cousins (“green,” “eco-friendly,” “environmental,” “organic,” etc.) every day. In class we learned that some products and services claiming to be “green,” are in fact only “greenwashed.” We also learned that environmental decision making stems from (among other factors) a consumer’s knowledge, and labels are a source of that knowledge.

This paper requires you to find a product that claims to be “sustainable,” critically evaluate its sustainability, and make suggestions for improvement through a revamped product label. The product you select might be something you see in a grocery or retail store, an ad on TV or online, or otherwise. You will need to do some research about the company that offers the product, so make sure the item you choose has some information about it online.

You will also need to research the product itself. You may be able to find information on the specific brand (ex: Horizon Milk). If there is no research on the specific brand, search for the generic product (ex: Organic milk, electric cars, and green cleaning products).

To get full points, respond directly to each of the prompts below. This assignment is a research paper, and therefore requires you to provide in-text citation to accompany all non-common knowledge. Information you learn from lecture should not be considered common knowledge. You must cite your sources using external materials, and follow up on your citations with your own original analysis.

In your paper:

Introduce the product (15 points)
what is the product and how does it claim to be “sustainable?” (Ex: does it reduce carbon emissions? Is it locally grown? Is it organic?) (4 points)

Include a picture of the product showing the “green” label and a link to the producer’s website. (5 points)
Where did you come across this product? Include the city/town as well as the specific store or URL if online. (5 points)
Have you used the product before? Do you always recall it advertised as “green?” (1 points)
Critically analyze the products “sustainability:” (25 points)

Where is the product produced? Get as specific as possible in scale (ex: city, county, region within a country). (4 points)
How far away is the area of production from where you personally might purchase the product? Why does the mileage relate to sustainability? Use information you have learned from lecture or readings about the “local” scale for sustainability in your response. (6 points)

Does the product claim to be (1) environmentally, (2) socially, and/or (3) economically sustainable? If so, how? If not, how might the product become more sustainable under that pillar? Be sure to address each pillar of sustainability in your response. (15 points, five for each pillar).
Is the product greenwashed? (35 points)

Define greenwashing from from the EHP article. (5 points)
Based on your product research, would you consider this product to be “greenwashed?” If so, why? If not, why not? Refer to the appropriate “sins” from the EHP article to answer. (10 points)

What new information should be available to the consumer before purchasing this product? Make a one page advertisement of the product with your new sustainability information/labels/certifications for the sustainability-conscious consumer. Explain why you designed the new label as such, and how it will better inform the sustainable consumer (your new product label can account for the photo page of your paper). (5 points)

[Order Now]

Where should the responsibility for sustainable consumption lie? With the individual? With the corporation? With the retailer? The government? Others? Explain your rationale. Refer to what you’ve learned about an individual’s capacity vs. responsibility in living a pro-environmental lifestyle based on both the Kollmus/Agyeman and Middlemiss readings (10 points).
How has your research on the sustainability of this product changed the way you perceive other products and services claiming to be sustainable? What, if anything, will you do differently when considering a “green” purchase in the future? (5 points)

Environmental Decision Making Stems Essay Assignment

RUBRIC Excellent Quality 95-100%   Introduction 45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Literature Support 91-84  points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Methodology 58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. Average Score 50-85% 40-38 points More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. 83-76  points There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. 52-49  points The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Poor Quality 0-45% 37-1 points The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. 75-1 points There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. 48-1 points There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Environmental Decision Making Stems Essay Assignment Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

Environmental Decision Making Stems Essay Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!