Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Description
For this assignment,
you will have an opportunity to practice academic research. There are several ways to begin research. As you find sources that catch your attention, view the works that are cited for those sources. Much of research simply involves following up on works cited. If an article or text has met the academic rigor necessary to achieve publication and appear in your database, you can be sure that the works cited/bibliography page contains the relevant sources you would need to be familiar with if you were interested in writing on the same topic.
Another way to begin academic research is by using Google Scholar. Learn about it here:
Google Scholar For many scholarly articles, you need access to a database to view the full text. Also, university libraries have extensive collections where you can simply find the physical text you need and do your work there in a study area. Luckily, Google Scholar allows you to find several open resources as well.
To practice academic research for this assignment, do the following:
1) Search academic/scholarly resources for materials relates to any aspect of environmental and/or animal ethics that interests you.
2) Review your findings in order to locate articles/books that are informative on your topic.
3) Provides a citation for no less than 12 SOURCES you found. For each source, offer THREE SENTENCES stating what you found interesting about it or what issues it raises that you would like to know more about. Topic: FACTORY FARMS
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/