Enron Scandal Two Perspectives of The Scandal Discussion

December 17, 2022

Description
Web Searches.
The drill is rather simple, and it allows for significant freedom of choice on
your part (this is the essence of philosophy!)
First, you are on your honor when I ask that you examine a number of articles on the assigned
topic. Then, select two articles that offer different perspectives on the topic. They may be
pro/contra, or pro or contra for differing reasons, or even perspectives from different time
periods. (This option I find quite interesting.) This allows for a variety of viewpoints from
which I learn, and later in the term Ill ask you to share some of your searches with others,
with mutual comment. More on this later.
Summarize the articles content and finally comment on both the quality of the articles and on
the topic itself.
1-2 pages, standard margins, and please include the links to the articles.
Here are the specific topics:
Web Search #1:
Enron.
Choose articles that present different perspectives on this American
debacle. (It might be difficult to find a pro-Enron article!

Enron Scandal Two Perspectives of The Scandal Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.