Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
This assignment focuses on your ability to: create effective thesis statements; synthesize research, text support, and personal analyses into a cohesive essay; defend an argument; properly cite researched material in APA format.
The purpose of completing this assignment is: as a student, career professional, and individual, learning how to defend your side of an argument with data, experience, and valid information is of paramount importance. As a student at Post, use this assignment to master the objectives listed above, particularly APA citation and reference page formatting. You need to know APA and argumentation techniques!
Prompt (what will you be writing about):
Despite having sold more than 40 million copies, To Kill a Mockingbird is still one of the most banned books in American school curriculum. This is based in its adult theme and charged language.
Now that you have viewed this version (which is almost identical to the novel), what do you think about his ban? Please respond to the following prompt, using the film study, and two other academic/reliable sources. In your essay, use cited text examples from both research sources as well as the film.
Should Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird be banned in middle and high schools? Why or why not?
Instructions (how to get it done):
You are welcome to use the following template:
o It is apparent that Harper Lee’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, should be banned in middle and high schools because of reason #1, reason #2,
reason #3.
o According to research, Lee’s novel has been on the list of top ten banned books since it was written in 1960 (Miller, 1986).
OR
o According to Miller (1986), Lee’s novel has been on the list of top ten banned books since it was written in 1960.
o for in text citations:
▪ (Director, year) which is (Mulligan, 1962)
o for the reference page citation:
▪ Mulligan, R. (1962). To Kill a Mockingbird. Brentwood Productions.
Requirements:
3–4-page length of the essay.
Position Paper Rubric
Does Not Meet Expectations
0-11
Below Expectations
12-13
Needs Improvement
14-15
Satisfactory
16-17
Meets Expectations
18-20
Organization Many details are not in a logical or expected order. The paper does not use paragraphs.
Writing may have little discernible organization, but some details are not in a logical or expected order. The paper uses paragraphs ineffectively.
Writing has adequate discernible organization. Paragraphs are generally used effectively.
Writing is organized and details are placed in a logical order. Paragraphs are mostly used effectively.
Writing is effective, purposeful, and well-organized. Paragraphs are used effectively.
Persuasiveness Fails to develop arguments.
Some arguments are developed but need further elaboration.
Develops most arguments.
Satisfactorily develops arguments.
Expertly and fully develops arguments.
Evidence and Support
Does not include researched or text support and/or text support is not cited.
Very little evidence is given and used in the essay properly. Research evidence may not be incorporated. Evidence may not relate to the thesis statement. Evidence is cited but not with the proper formatting.
Some evidence is used from one research source and the film; evidence is somewhat related to the thesis statement. Evidence may or may not always cited properly.
Evidence is used from two outside sources and the film; evidence is mostly tied to the thesis statement and used properly and is cited properly.
Evidence is integrated from at least two outside sources and the film; evidence is used effectively and cited properly.
APA Format
APA format is not followed.
Errors in four areas of APA format and style.
Errors in three areas of APA format and style.
Errors in two areas of APA format and style.
No errors in APA format and style.
Grammar and Mechanics
Grammar and mechanics’ errors make the essay incomprehensible.
Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and mechanics errors occur throughout document. Word choices are seldom academic. Sentence structure may be illogical or unclear.
Several errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling and mechanics present. Word choice reveals some understanding of academic language requirements. Many sentence structure issues exist.
Some spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanical errors are evident. Academic language is upheld. The sentence structure is often logical and clear so that relationships among ideas are established.
Free of punctuation, spelling, grammar, and other mechanical errors. Consistent use of academic word choices. Sentence structure is mostly logical and clear.
*A zero can be earned if the above criteria are not met. *Plagiarism will result in a zero.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/