EN 121 Analytical Thinking and Writing Final Research Paper

December 8, 2022

EN 121 Analytical Thinking and Writing Final Research Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

EN 121 Analytical Thinking and Writing Final Research Paper

[Order Now]

Your research paper must contain the following:

6 BODY pages,
Cover page (First Page),
Abstract (Second page),
APA formatted Reference page (Last page),
Typed, double spaced, 12-point font, Times New Roman
APA format that included an upper left header on each page, and APA formatted in-text citations, as well as the Reference page. The latest version for APA formatting has eliminated the header from a research paper.

Types of sources that can be used but must be reputable and reliable are:

newspapers

magazines

books

scholarly journals

websites

A well-researched paper will include a variety of sources. For academic papers, books and scholarly journals tend to provide the best information.

Requirements for sources on Reference Page:

Minimum of SIX sources, add more if your research paper entails

At least ONE book source (Print or Electronic)
No more than THREE websites can be used
Minimum of TWO Peer Reviewed/ Scholarly Sources used from the Library Databases MUST be used. If you do not use a book source there should be a third Scholarly Article from the electronic databases.

MUST HAVE LEVEL 1 HEADINGS THROUGHOUT PAPER.

*Hint: Main Points from Outline Assignment*

If you have level 2-5 heading that is fine but stay in the comfort of level 1 headings if you are unsure of the format.

Due Dates and Other Information Important for this Paper

Annotated Bibliography (Weeks 5 & 6)

Outline (Week 7)

Title page and Reference list (Week 8)

Body pages only (Week 9)

Introduction only (Week 10)

Conclusion and Abstract only (Week 11)

First Draft (Week 12) not graded but reviewed

Final Draft (Week 13)

[Order Now]

Oral Presentation of Highlights of Final Draft (Week 14)

THIS ASSIGNMENT IS IMPORTANT!!! Remember, this paper is 20% of your final grade. The Oral presentation of the paper is your final and worth 15% of your grade.

It doesn’t matter what discipline you are in; you will have to write well-researched papers. You need to get used to finding good sources (not just whatever pops up first in a google search) and figuring out ways to effectively integrate those sources into your own writing. Becoming familiar with techniques to determine, credible, reliable, accurate, and current information is critical to writing a successful research paper, as is correct documentation using APA formatting, especially for in-text citations and a Reference page.

EN 121 Analytical Thinking and Writing Final Research Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.