Ell 240 week 5 final paper

January 30, 2023

Ell 240 week 5 final paper

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Ell 240 week 5 final paper

You have spent five weeks learning all of the nuances of helping students learn English as an additional language. The process goes well beyond “just learning English” and includes very complicated processes that need explicit teaching of language. For the final assignment, you will combine everything you have learned to analyze a case study. TESOL Pre-K–12 English Language Proficiency Standards Framework For this assignment, you will choose either the K-12 or Adult Language Case Study. It is recommended that you choose the case study that fits with the age you have been choosing most throughout the course. Part I: Analysis Case Study Analysis. Describe any unique characteristics of the students. Hypothesize how these characteristics could impact language learning. Propose what their current proficiency levels are. Explain what evidence led you to that conclusion? Propose which strategies are currently being used by the teacher. Explain if the strategies are effective based on what we know? Why or why not? Provide evidence for your argument. Synthesize what theories are currently being used by the teacher. Propose what theories/concepts would be beneficial in this situation. It will be important to provide specific examples and use vocabulary and concepts that we have learned in our course. Part II: Action Plan Propose two language objectives that would be beneficial for helping the ELLs progress in language at this point based on what you have read. Integrate two interventions/activities for each language goal that will provide comprehensible input necessary for the students to progress. Synthesize how you are applying fundamental theories, concepts, and vocabulary to develop the strategies/interventions. To structure your writing, Your audience will be a group of colleagues who are unfamiliar with these ideas or who need clarification and strategies to help with the presented problem. Your role will be a well-informed teacher with knowledge of teaching ELLs. The format will be an academic essay. The purpose is to develop a clear response to the questions following the story. You are writing using an Essay Structure. The Final Paper Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center. Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Microsoft Word. Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice resource for additional guidance. Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper. For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions as well as Writing a Thesis Statement, refer to the Writing Center resources. Must use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text. The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment. Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper guide. Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List resource in the Writing Center for specifications

[Order Now]

Ell 240 week 5 final paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.