Elements of Contract Interpretation Case Assignment Discussion

December 2, 2022

Elements of Contract Interpretation Case Assignment Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Elements of Contract Interpretation Case Assignment Discussion

[Order Now]

Part 1

Masha and Dasha are very good friends. Masha’s apartment needs decorating so she calls Dasha, who is unemployed at the moment, and asks her: “Will you decorate all three rooms in my apartment for USD 200?” Dasha agrees. On May 1 she spends 80 USD on materials and starts work. On 3 May Masha tells her that she needs the work to be finished by 12 May because her parents are coming to stay. Dasha agrees to finish the work by then. Unfortunately, Dasha is a bit lazy and the work is only half done by 14 May. She finally finishes on 20 May and asks Masha for her USD 200, plus USD 80 for the materials. Masha can’t believe this. She insists that the USD 200 included the cost of materials, and anyway Dasha finished late. She has also lost her job in the last few days and offers her USD 120. Dasha consults you for advice.

Under law, four elements are needed to create a contract.

They are:

intention to create a legal relationship
offer
acceptance
consideration

Q: Please define each element and outline how they apply in this case

[Order Now]

Business Law Possession Legality Memorandum

You need to write 3 individual memorandums based on the 3 situations I attached:

We have to base our memorandum using the irac rules:

The IRAC method is a framework for organizing your answer to a business law essay question. The basic structure is: Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion. Using this simple framework for structuring your answer will ensure that you have written a complete answer.

Elements of Contract Interpretation Case Assignment Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.