EHR Analysis and Quality Improvement

January 17, 2023

EHR Analysis and Quality Improvement

Order Number	6556467543547
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

EHR Analysis and Quality Improvement

EHR Analysis and Quality Improvement For this discussion, use the Vila Health: Analysis of an EHR System media simulation as context. Based on the role you undertook in the media simulation, provide a brief analysis of the current EHR system at Independence Medical Center, as well as comment on how the EHR could be utilized to create improvements in quality and patient care. In your main post: Analyze the current state of the EHR system at Independence Medical Center. Identify its most obvious strengths. Identify its most obvious flaws. Discuss how the data are currently captured, tracked, analyzed, and shared. Identify which, if any, of these areas meet regulatory policy and incentive guidelines. Identify ways in which the EHR system potentially impacts the experience and quality of patient care at Independence Medical Center. Identify areas within the EHR system or processes that could be improved. Which of these improvements have the biggest potential for positive impacts? Why?

[Order Now]

EHR Analysis and Quality Improvement

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.