Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
How Relationships between Couples Can Affected by Sex
This paper will get you used to using professional journals in exploring the field of human sexuality. For your paper, you must first find a topic within the field of human sexuality that interests you (explore the course outline and your textbook for inspiration) and for which you can find three (3) peer-reviewed journal articles.
Each article should present original research data (not just a discussion, opinion, review, or theoretical paper), and all articles should directly relate to the topic you have chosen. When writing the paper, you should use the following format:
Introduction – State the topic you chose and why you were interested in it.
Research – Summarize in your own words the findings of each of the studies that you read. What is the purpose of each study? What was learned in each? Be sure to go beyond what is contained in the abstract alone.
Evaluation – In discussing each study, give your own evaluation. How good was each study? Why? Do you agree with the conclusions drawn by the authors? Why or why not? Could the findings be explored another way?
Summary – After presenting the individual studies, tie them together. What do they have in common? Do their findings fit together in any way? What have you learned about the topic you chose?
Each paper must follow APA formatting. Be sure to use in-line citations and references to avoid plagiarizing. Your paper must be typewritten and be no more than 5 double-spaced pages. Additionally, copy the abstract (summary paragraph at the beginning of each journal article) for each of the three (3) articles and attach these copies with your paper. You can cut-and-paste the abstracts on pages after the Reference page.
Sample APA formatting: https://my.ilstu.edu/~jhkahn/APAsample.pdf
Sample APA reference guide: https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdf
If you have any questions, please come see me after class or during office hours. You can also visit the Writing Center for further help.
Directions to Submit
Submit your work here in the CANVAS system as a Word 97-2003, .docx or other word processing file. (Google Docs, Open Office are also acceptable. If you are using iWorks, please convert to one of these file formats, as sometimes it can be difficult to view your document.)
On the right-hand Menu, you will see a SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT button with a white plus sign.
Click on the SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT Then click BROWSE to look for your file on your computer.
When done, click the SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT button.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/