Effective team management

February 1, 2023

Effective team management

Order Number	56843456970876546
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Effective team management

Simon Discussion Week 3 (Chapters 3 & 4):

Discussion 1:

In these chapters what’s talked about is the importance of having a healthy, effective and collaborative environment in the organization. With a healthy and collaborative working environment you are more likely to be more productive and the company will benefit from it in the long run. Do you think that companies are able to increase productivity improving how they manage institutional knowledge? How can you tell if the organization you work for is healthy or not? What are some factors that could lead to a unhealthy organization?

In chapter 4 it talks about how email allows anyone in the world to contact you and how email benefits from a powerful network effect. It also talks about how with email if you make a mistake you most likely have to reply to your own email and correct your mistake. Do you think contemporary collaboration hubs will be beneficial? Being that email allows just about anyone in the world to contact you do you think email was designed for collaboration?

Discussion 2:

The big idea that is talked about in these chapters are how important collaboration is in a organization or in your job. He mentions that having a heathy collaborative organization you are more likely to be profitable and effective collaborations creates different benefits within the organization. What would be some benefits that effective collaborations brings to an organization?

To go along the same lines of the effective collaboration the book mentions organizational health. What would be some different ways a organization can bring organizational health to the work environment? Then what are some things that could possibly cause some problems with organizational health within a organization?

[Order Now]

Effective team management

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.