Effect of Covid-19 Isolation Policies on People’s Mental Health

December 8, 2022

Effect of Covid-19 Isolation Policies on People’s Mental Health

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Effect of Covid-19 Isolation Policies on People’s Mental Health

[Order Now]

3 different research questions you might want to investigate.

DON’T FORGET IT NEEDS TO COMPARE 2 DIFFETRENT COUTRIES/STATES “I AM COMPARING CALIFORNIA AND UTAH STATES”

GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH PROPOSALS

RESEARCH AND EVALUATION

A research proposal always contains the same basic parts and structure; this is one of the features of APA format—the reader always knows where to look for particular components of a paper. I am expecting something in the 3–5-page range (not counting title page, references, nor appendix). It should contain enough detail so that I (and you) know exactly what you plan to do, and can see a logical rationale behind it.

The components which should be included are as follows:

Title page (use APA Format)
Brief introduction explaining your interest in the topic area (optional)
Literature review. This should place your topic in a larger context, and provide a rationale for why you are planning to do your particular study. This will be much more limited than what you see in published articles; but I do not expect you to be an expert on your topic area yet! I expect that you will draw from at least 5 professional academic sources, including at least one review article. It can be useful to think of the flow of the literature review as a funnel, moving from:
Importance of the topic in light of the larger context
Previous work done in this area, arranged from general theory & research to increasingly specific studies relevant to your research interest
Clear statement of one or more specific research questions (these should proceed logically from the foregoing)
Statement of one or more hypotheses you plan to test (quantitative research only)
Brief justification of the approach/methods you selected, including consideration of limits on your time and resources.
You can use Spickard’s 6-steps (as modified in lecture) as a resource to structure your thinking here.
Methods. This should be divided into the following sub-sections:
Participants: how many, what characteristics, how you plan to select and contact them (i.e., sampling method and access), if there will be separate groups (experimental and control) how will these be selected?
Procedures: describe in detail what you plan to do with your participants. If you are doing a survey or interview-based study, this section should include a note that the questionnaire(s) or interview questions are contained in the appendix
Ethics: describe the informed consent process (and note that the form is contained in the appendix), what steps you took to safeguard participants’ rights, privacy, provisions for debriefing (if deception used)
Analysis: A general description of how you plan to analyze your data. If quantitative, what sorts of statistics will you use to test your hypotheses? If qualitative, how will you organize and transform your data, and which general approach will guide your analysis (ethnography, grounded theory, phenomenology, discourse analysis, etc.)?
References (employing standard APA format)
Appendix. This should contain your Informed Consent Form (feel free to adapt from the one I posted for Handout #1) and either the questionnaire(s) you plan to use, a list of specific interview questions you will use, or any other documents necessary to flesh out your procedures.

Effect of Covid-19 Isolation Policies on People’s Mental Health

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.