EDU201- Google Workspace for Education Discussion

Order Number	6876435476348764764
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

hELLO, PLEASE REVIEW LESSON 7 READING AND SOURCES IN ORDER TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS FOR THIS ASSGINMENT. PLEASE CITE ALL RESPONSES THANK YOU

Google Workspace for Education Discussion

For this discussion, please respond to the following questions:

After reviewing the various Google Workspace for Education applications, which apps do you see yourself mostly using in the classroom?

Which apps do you see yourself using the least? Why?

Provide at least one example of a Google Workspace for Education app that could replace a “traditional” paper and pencil assignment.

Lesson 7 Readings and Resources

Readings and Resources

Read the online article “How Instructional Technology Can Improve the Learning Process,” Links to an external site.authored by LSU Online LINK: https://online.lsu.edu/newsroom/articles/how-instructional-technology-can-improve-learning-process/

Read the online article “Web 2.0,” Links to an external site.authored by a contributor to TechTarget LINK: https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/Web-20-or-Web-2

Review the Google Workspace for Education website. LINK: https://edu.google.com/intl/ALL_us/workspace-for-education/editions/education-fundamentals/

Read the online article “TeacherTube and Other YouTube Alternatives for Instructional Use (Part 1 of 2)” Links to an external site.authored by Kelly Walsh LINK: https://www.emergingedtech.com/2009/03/teachertube-and-other-youtube-alternatives-for-instructional-use-part-1-of-2/

Watch the video “Google Jamboard Tutorial + Ways to Use It in the Classroom,” Links to an external site.created by Pocketful of Primary LINK: https://youtu.be/6UYFVJU6pO8

Read the online article “Flipgrid for ALL! 50+ Ways to Use Flipgrid in Your Class,” authored by Karly Moura LINK: https://ditchthattextbook.com/catch-the-flipgrid-fever-15-ways-to-use-flipgrid-in-your-class/

View “How to Use Flipgrid as a Teacher,” created by Howfinity LINK: https://youtu.be/2S1CSY0KiGk

View “Flipgrid Tutorial for Teachers,” created by EdTech Classroom LINK: https://youtu.be/Wy5xHwDqOsI

[Order Now]

EDU201- Google Workspace for Education Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.