EDU 450 Handling Difficult Situations CLC Assignment

December 16, 2022

EDU 450 Handling Difficult Situations CLC Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

EDU 450 Handling Difficult Situations CLC Assignment

EDU 450, Handling, Difficult, Situations, CLC, Assignment

This is a CLC. For this assignment, focus on the group of students in your program of study.

Consider the following:

What makes some students more of a discipline issue, when others are “following the plan”? What can the teacher do to resolve this issue?
What are some unexpected situations that can cause disruptions in the classroom? For example: teacher has car accident or a school evacuation?
What are your plans to get through these types of situations?
When do you have to disclose behavior reported by students: abuse, drug use, pregnant, hurting others, hurting self?
What are the legal and ethical implications for classroom management related to the rights and responsibilities of students, parents, and teachers?
What other difficult situations might you experience? How can you plan for the unexpected?

Write a 250–500-word essay that discusses how you would handle difficult situations in your future classrooms. Reference the questions for consideration. Include suggestions, opinions, and implications.

Use 3-5 scholarly resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines

***This is a group assignment and I will choose to do the highlighted bullets***

Fraction Lesson Plans

Details:

Select a CCRS related to Number and Operations in Fractions. Using the “Class Profile,” create three lesson plans with activities that:

1 Use models in fraction tasks, including area, length, and set/quantity models;

2 Emphasize academic language, including partitioning, sharing tasks, and iterating; and

3 Explore equivalent fractions

Visit the Teaching Channel website and review three videos of teachers teaching fractions. Write a 250-500 word review of what you observed and support your review with references to the assigned readings.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines

Videos

View “Common Core State Standards for Math,” located on the Teaching Channel website.

https://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/common-core-state-standards-for-math?fd=1

View “The Mathematics Standards: How They Were Developed and Who Was Involved,” located on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnjbwJdcPjE&list=PL913348FFD75155C6

This assignment uses a rubric. Class profile is the other attachment I had given you before.

Criteria Excellent 100%

Fraction Content	Lesson plans include engaging instructional activities that stimulate critical thinking and problem solving, use models in fraction tasks, emphasize academic language, and explore equivalent fractions.
Review	Response skillfully and convincingly critiques the videos of teachers teaching fractions. It includes several distinctive supporting details and/or examples.
PLANNING: Instructional Script and Materials	Lesson plan demonstrates well-developed and skillful use of effective, student-centered verbal, nonverbal and electronic media communication tools and techniques to create opportunities for active inquiry, collaboration and supportive interaction.
PLANNING: Meeting the Varied Learning Needs of Students	Lesson plan has creative, well-developed differentiated instructional activities and supports clearly designed to meet the needs of specific individuals or groups with similar needs, consistent with the Class Profile.
PLANNING: Meeting the Language Needs of Students	Lesson plan clearly and comprehensively incorporates content-based vocabulary, targeted instructional support for the use of vocabulary, and additional language demands associated with the language function consistent with the Class Profile.
PLANNING: Assessments to Monitor Student Learning	Planned assessments creatively allow for multiple forms of evidence in order to monitor the understanding and skill development of students in the content area throughout and at the end of the lesson. They are well aligned with the stated learning targets and standards and include well-crafted modifications for the individual needs of students, based on the Class Profile.
Rationale	Rationale clearly describes carefully planned, plausible reasoning for choices of instructional materials and strategies in light of learning goals and student outcomes.
Mechanics	The lesson plan is free of mechanical and conventional errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and topic-related language.

[Order Now]

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.