ECOM 1000 Analytics for Decision Making Project

December 8, 2022

ECOM 1000 Analytics for Decision Making Project

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

ECOM 1000 Analytics for Decision Making Project

[Order Now]

The country representatives have accepted your proposal. Please go ahead with carrying out the activities/tasks mentioned in the proposal (part 1). In addition to the activities stated in part 1, the representatives would also like you to include the following items in your report:

Explore the relationship across a pair of different aspects of the country over time. For example, is there a relationship between the population and the environment indicators over time? Can this relationship be quantified? Note, that your choice of aspects could be influenced by the available data.
Construct a confidence interval for one of the aspects. Please state all assumptions clearly and provide an interpretation of the interval.
Are there any legal or privacy issues with the data that is being used in the report? Please provide some details/justification.

The three requests above must be incorporated into the methodology section i.e., update the methodology section from part 1. As before, we are expected to apply the knowledge from the unit modules to address these requests. One of the main features of the final report is the results of the analysis. For this section you are expected to produce a dashboard using the data for your country. The dashboard is simply a collection of different types of graphs (similar to the ones in our tutorial/lab work).

The emphasis is presenting the data using different types of plots such as time series plots, scatter plots, histograms, box plots and/or cumulative percentage charts. Ensure that the plot type is matched well with the data that is being used. In addition to this, results should also include numerical data summaries as well as the analysis pertaining to the first two requests.

Lastly, it is very important that we provide brief commentary on all plots/results of the analysis. The commentary is expected to be based on the content covered in the unit. The final report should contain the following components:

Title page – update from part 1
Cover letter – update from part 1: This should now also include an updated statement about what the report is about. It should explicitly state any changes (if applicable) that you have made since the original proposal.
Tables of contents – update from part 1
Executive summary – A brief outline/summary of what the report contains. This

summary must be between 0.75 to 1 page maximum. This summary must NOT contain any plots and/or tables. It is strongly advised that this section be written at the end once all the other sections have been finalised.

Introduction – update from part 1 (proposal section): Incorporate the coverage of the new requests.
Methodology – update from part 1: Please include the methodology for addressing the three new requests.
Results – Refer to the description of this section on the first page.
Conclusion & Recommendations – Adequately summarise the main results of the analysis and propose recommendations/suggestions for future work. For example, what (in your expert opinion) would be possible if you had more time and resources.
References – update from part 1: A list of resources (include data sources) used for referenced in the final report. Please use the Chicago referencing style. Refer to the unit outline for further details.
Project timeline – update from part 1: List of activities/tasks that were completed in order to finalise the report and time taken for each of these activities.
Appendix – This section should contain the original proposal (part 1) submission. Word limit Please note that there is a maximum word limit of 2100 words for the report. This excludes the title page, cover letter, table of contents, references, project timeline and appendix. Additional information and notes Please watch the accompanying assessment video which explains the requirements in greater detail.

Please consult with your tutor as well as use consultation times to discuss or seek feedback for the final report before the due date. Similar to Part 1, the frequently asked questions (FAQs) document has been uploaded on Blackboard which will include popular queries from student and staff. Please review this document on a regular basis.

You may also find the FAQs document for Part 1 helpful as well. In addition to this, the discussion on the ED forum may also be useful to students Submission details Please submit your final proposal via Turnitin on the 15th of October 2021 by 12 noon Australian Western Standard Time (AWST).

Standard penalties (see unit outline) will apply to late submissions which have no approval. Please also be mindful of the academic integrity requirements for this unit. Please refer to the unit outline for further details regarding this. The marking rubric on the next page will be used to mark the submitted reports.

Section High Distinction (80%+) Distinction (70%-80%) Credit (60%-70%) Pass (50%-60%) Fail (0%-50%)

Formatting (3 marks)

Same as distinction, the report reads well and contains no spelling and grammatical errors.

Same as credit, but also satisfies the word limit. The report contains labels and captions for all figures and/or tables.

Same as pass, but also includes good presentation (consistent font size, section headings and page numbering).

Include all the sections required for the required report.

Failed to include majority of the sections required for the final report.

Executive Summary (4 marks)

Same as distinction, the executive summary contains appropriate recommendations for the future.

Same as credit, the executive summary between three quarter of a page to a single page.

The executive summary covers all the content mentioned in the report.

The executive summary only covers some of the content mentioned in the report.

The report does not contain an executive summary.

Introduction and Scope (7 marks)

Same as distinction and the introduction contains the motivation/purpose for the report i.e. why this work is important (a brief statement only).

Same as credit and the report includes some of the limitations regarding the aspects and the new requests.

Same as pass and the report contains all the required aspects with sufficient details. The report addresses the three new requests.

The report contains an adequate introduction and some of the aspects have been included with sufficient details. The cover letter has been updated.

The report does not contain an adequate introduction and has an un-updated version of the cover letter.

Methodology (7 marks)

Same as distinction and the report contains some details about the assumptions and/or limitations of any of the methods used.

Same as credit and the report contains some details about the data limitations.

The report mentions relevant and appropriate methods for presenting and analysis data. The report contains information on data sources which includes the usage policy of the data.

The report mentions some methods of presenting and analysing data. The report contains information on the data sources.

The report does not mention any methods of presenting or analysing data. The report does not contain information on the data sources.

ECOM1000 – Project Part 2: Final Report

ECOM1000: Analytics for Decision Making Page | 4

Faculty of Business and Law | School Accounting, Economics and Finance CRICOS Provider Code 00301J

Section High Distinction (80%+) Distinction (70%-80%) Credit (60%-70%) Pass (50%-60%) Fail (0%-50%)

Results (7 marks)

Same as distinction and the commentary contains the limitations of the results.

Same as credit and the results in the report are organised well i.e. plots are presented well and numerical summaries are in tables.

The report contains adequate results and commentary on all aspects as well as the new requests.

The report contains some results and commentary on selected aspects.

The reports contain very limited or no results on selected aspects. The report contains limited or no commentary on the results.

Conclusions and Recommendations (4 marks)

Same as distinction, but the recommendations aim to address the limitations of the methodology and/or results.

Same as credit, but also contains practical recommendations for future work.

Same as pass, but also contains well stated conclusions that adequately summarise the results of the report.

The report contains some brief conclusions and recommendations.

The report does not contain any conclusions or recommendations.

References and Project Timeline (3 marks)

Same as distinction, but the references are of a high quality (i.e., journal articles)

Same as credit, but the timeline is well-presented with an appropriate list of activities and duration times.

The report contains at least three references which are used well to support the report and the timeline is well- presented with an adequate number of activities.

The report contains at least three references formatted correctly and well-presented timeline.

The report contains fewer than three reference and a poorly presented timeline.

ECOM 1000 Analytics for Decision Making Project

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.