Discussion Classmate Responses Assignment

December 31, 2022

Discussion Classmate Responses Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Discussion Classmate Responses Assignment

INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

Nature offers many examples of specialization and collaboration. Ant colonies and bee hives are but two examples of nature’s sophisticated organizations. Each thrives because their members specialize by tasks, divide labor, and collaborate to ensure food, safety, and general well-being of the colony or hive.

Of course, humans don’t fare too badly in this regard either. And healthcare is a great example. As specialists in the collection, access, and application of data, nurse informaticists collaborate with specialists on a regular basis to ensure that appropriate data is available to make decisions and take actions to ensure the general well-being of patients.

In this Discussion, you will reflect on your own observations of and/or experiences with informaticist collaboration. You will also propose strategies for how these collaborative experiences might be improved.

BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 3

Respond to at least two of your colleagues * on two different days, offering one or more additional interaction strategies in support of the examples/observations shared or by offering further insight to the thoughts shared about the future of these interactions.

Class response 1

Nursing is among the professions that need a collaborative approach to function. All nursing staff must cooperate with technology experts and nursing informatics to enable seamless service delivery if better public services are going to be provided. Whenever a patient enters a medical institution, an office manager who is knowledgeable about medical records welcomes them and guides them to their next step after taking their information (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2021). A nurse evaluates the patient and directs them to the triage area where they can input their different issues, such as the urgency of their treatments.

Discussion Classmate Responses Assignment

Prior to the physician seeing the patient, conditions including blood pressure, insulin levels, and Bodyweight are evaluated since they are so important. If the mechanism for documenting is computerized, the same outcomes may be seen in the patient’s medical record, in which they are sent straight to the doctor who is set to see the patients that day (Arikan et al., 2022). After assessing the patient, admitting them to the hospital, or ordering more tests, the physician of the day suggests the prescription. When it comes to treating a wound or admitting a patient in accordance with the doctor’s instructions, a nurse may step in at this point. Patients conduct this treatment every day, and it calls for the cooperation of nurses and other professionals to provide the necessary services.

As a result of eliminating needless delays and accelerating operations, strategy questions on how to enhance contacts and technology are successful and, in the worst instances, may even save the loss of life. Effective online patient data transfer occurs upon admission to screening and in the physician’s examination area, preventing delays, cutting costs, and ensuring efficient provision of medical services. Nursing informatics is still developing, particularly in a field in which the future of nursing appears to be more promising (Sena et al., 2021). Eliminating the traditional patient documenting method improves teamwork, lowers costs, increases productivity, and raises the standard of care. Professional relationships reportedly reach a new level thanks to emerging technology, which enhances healthcare institutions’ service delivery.

References

Arikan, F., Kara, H., Erdogan, E., & Ulker, F. (2022). Barriers to Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems from the Perspective of Nurses: A Cross-sectional Study. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 40(4), 236-243.

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2021). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

Sena, V., Arranz, N., Lucas, P., Park, H. W., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2021). Big data and network analysis in national innovation systems (NIS). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168.

Class mate response 2

Discussion Classmate Responses Assignment

Interactions with Other Specialists

Nurse informaticists frequently interact with other professions, including other nurses, physicians, and non-clinical staff, such as the chief operating officer and management. Nibbelink et al. (2018) stated that, nurse informaticists have various duties, including identifying, defining, managing, as well as communicating data, information, and knowledge

to facilitate evidence translation into practice. This includes explaining billing data to managers and other nurses, sharing patient information with nurses and physicians to promote care collaboration at all levels, reducing clinical errors, and informing clinical and managerial decision-making. Translating data into usable knowledge that other specialists can use in the care continuum is also another critical function of nurse informaticists.

Improvement Strategies

Improved coordination is essential in improving the quality of interactions between nurse informaticists and other specialists. As McGonigle and Mastrian (2022) highlight, informatics involves automation and seamless data sharing to reduce costs and enhance user experiences. As a result, incorporating the information in the care process, such as promoting data sharing, will eliminate the time-consuming physical interactions, where nurses and physicians can access knowledge without scheduling physical or online meetings with the informatics team. The emphasis is on automation and data sharing to allow access and remove barriers associated with user inconveniences and time and cost challenges.

Anticipated Impact

The continued evolution of nursing informatics will have a significant positive effect on care quality and meeting the evolving patient needs. Booth et al. (2021) state that transformations related to digitally delivered care will substantially optimize patient care benefits. In such a case, reduced costs, enhanced access, affordability, and improved patient experience are essential and are anticipated to improve the quality of care offered. Examples include telehealth’s role during the covid-19 pandemic and applications in triaging, patient monitoring, and billing. From such a perspective, evolutions in nurse informatics will substantially increase the quality of care offered, augmenting the profession and helping nurses offer better care.

References

Booth, R. G., Strudwick, G., McBride, S., O’Connor, S., & Solano López, A. L. (2021). How the nursing profession should adapt for a digital future. BMJ, n1190. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1190

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th Ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Nibbelink, C. W., Young, J. R., Carrington, J. M., & Brewer, B. B. (2018). Informatics solutions for the application of decision-making skills. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 30(2), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2018.02.006

[Order Now]

Discussion Classmate Responses Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.