Discrimination in Education Against Women and People with Disabilities

December 16, 2022

Discrimination in Education Against Women and People with Disabilities

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Discrimination in Education Against Women and People with Disabilities

Discrimination, Education, Women, People, Disabilities

According to Machi and McEnvoy (2016), “a literature review is a written argument that supports a thesis position by building a case from credible evidence obtained from previous research (p.5)”.

The Literature Review Model

You must present a logical argued case about your topic. To do that you must present your literature review in two ways. First you will need to do the argument of discovery in which you discuss and explain what is known about the subject (Machi & McEnvoy, 2016). Then, you will utilized the argument of advocacy in which you analyze and critique the knowledge gained to answer the argument, which is the thesis statement (Machi & McEnvoy, 2016).

An argument is the logical presentation of evidence that leads to and justifies a conclusion (Machi & McEnvoy, 2016).

For example: More students are reporting depression since the shutdowns started (), there have been a high number of suicide deaths in 2020 (), and depression can increase the risk for suicide (), therefore; shutdowns during the Coivd 19 pandemic were damaging to student’s mental health. “Student’s mental health has been damaged during the Covid 19 pandemic” is the thesis of our argument ().

Make sure in your final paper that you can address the following questions.

What is the stated conclusion?
What is the evidence that supports this conclusion?
Is that evidence supported/convincing enough?
Does the evidence logically explain the conclusion?

In your final paper outline you should have stated several points or claims about your topic. Claims are declarations of a proposed truth (Machi & McEnvoy, 2016). You will need to provide evidence to support that claim. Evidence is your actual data or the data/ results from other studies (your sources). Providing the claim and evidence is not enough. You will need to also provide the warrant. The warrant provides the logic connection, whether it is indirect or not.

For example:

You should not cross the street. (Claim)
The signal is red. (Evidence)
The unstated rule is that your stop on red. (Warrant)

Requirements of Literature Review

Follows APA style
6 pages long of CONTENT
APA Student Title page
Reference Page
8 sources (with 6 being quantitative research articles)
These should be the same sources that you choose for your annotations unless they do not meet the quantitative research requirement.

PY 205 Final Paper Grading Rubric

Student:

In the mechanics section, you are allowed 2 mistakes before points are deducted for each error. This can also serve as a checklist for you before submitting your work. I will refer to the type of error in the comments in the paper.

APA Style: (34 points)

Title Page: (6 pts – 2 pt each)

__________ Separate Title page

__________Page number

__________ Proper student title page elements

Citation: (6 pts)

__________In-text

Reference Page (8 pts – 2 pt each)

__________ Page Title

__________Alphabetical Order

__________ Proper Formatting of References

__________Indentation of References

Body: (14 pts- 2 pt each)

__________ Free of Extra Spacing

__________Page numbers

__________Title

__________Margins

__________Font (Double-Spaced)

__________Page Length

__________ Proper use of headings

Grammar & Mechanics (28 pts – 4 pts each)

__________Paraphrasing

__________ Contractions/Personal Pronouns

__________ Slang/Empty Phrases/Wordiness

__________Spelling

__________Punctuation

__________Clarity of Prose (basic grammar)

__________ Run-on and fragments

__________Organization

__________Quoting (Proper format)

Summary (Content) (38 points)

__________Introduce the topic (4 pts)

__________ Provide background info. (6 pts)

__________Synthesis of Articles/Description of the studies (12 pts)

__________Identification of problem or gap in research (12 pts)

__________ Conclusion (4 pts)

Comments

Points Possible: 100

Final Grade:

Claim

Evidence

Warrant

Reserach Interest

Identifies

Literature Review

Discovers and Advocates

Reserach Thesiss

Reserach Topics

Specifies and Frames

[Order Now]

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.