Discrimination for Gender and Races Discussion

December 10, 2022

Discrimination for Gender and Races Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Discrimination for Gender and Races Discussion

[Order Now]

Discrimination, Gender, Races, Discussion

Topic 3: Gender/Racial Differences in Characteristics

Topic 4: Gender/Racial Differences in Treatment (Discrimination)

Groups 4~6 will present in class in addition to submitting the reports. Group 4 is designated Topic 3, Group 5 is designated Topic 4. Group 6 has the freedom to choose either one topic. Please use slides for the presentation.

All other groups can choose either one of the two topics and submit a report on the due date. Everyone should be prepared to discuss and share their applications and findings in class.

Please refer to the group project guideline for length and content requirements.

Suggestions

Below are suggestions of what you can think about. You are by no means constrained by the suggestions provided here. Be creative and surprise me!

Topic 3: Gender/Racial Differences in Characteristics

Applications
Other than the differences in education or major choices we talked about in class, what other characteristics are different between men and women that could lead to wage differences. There are a lot of recent literature that examines various non-cognitive skill differences between men and women, such as risk-taking, personality, competitiveness, etc. Pick out something interesting to talk about.
Find statistics that shows that women receive less on-the-job training.
Find more recent statistics on occupational segregation based on gender or race, or statistics of other countries.
Find statistics on wage gaps between men and women by job types/major/occupation. For example, which job types have larger gender wage gaps than others? Are these due to differences in characteristics across gender?
Extended Knowledge
You can either start by coming up with a new question and then search for a paper that answers the question, or you can search in https://scholar.google.com/ the key words related to this topic, such as “wage gap between men and women” and find a relevant article you finding interesting and would like to share.
Find an article that summarizes all the observed characteristic differences across gender or across racial groups.

Topic 4: Gender/Racial Differences in Treatment (Discrimination)

Applications
Personal experience of discrimination, and analyze if it was taste discrimination or statistical discrimination.
Provide real-life examples of statistical discrimination, and explain why it is statistical discrimination.
Provide real-life examples of how employer taste discrimination is eliminated by competition.
Find news articles on discrimination cases, and analyze if they are taste discrimination or statistical discrimination.
Extended Knowledge
Find recent research that shows the results of Oaxaca Decomposition on gender wage gap, or racial wage gap.
Find research that tries to distinguish between taste discrimination and statistical discrimination.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Discrimination for Gender and Races Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.