Disability Presentation Developmental Delay 12-slide presentation

December 21, 2022

Disability Presentation Developmental Delay 12-slide presentation

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Disability Presentation Developmental Delay 12-slide presentation

[Order Now]

Disability Category Presentation (50 points) Students will create a twelve-slide presentation about one of VDOE’s fourteen disability categories. The professor will assign each student one of the disability categories and one of forty-nine states (Virginia not included). Use Microsoft PowerPoint to complete this assignment, and review the rubric on Moodle. The presentation should be organized according to the directions below:

*Note: My assignment is for the disability of Developmental Delay, as it relates to the state of Montana. This general sample is for VDOE (ie, Virginia) Mine MUST be for state of Montana

Slide Numbe r and/or Order

Disability Category Presentation Headings for Slides

R e q u i r e m e n t s f o r E a c h S l i d e ( R e v i e w t h e r u b r i c o n M o o d l e f o r a d di t i o n a l r e q u i r e m e n t s . )

1 Title Slide

N a m e , d i s a b i l i t y c a t e g o r y , c o u r s e n u m b e r , s e m e s t e r , a n d a t l e a s t o n e i m a g e .

2 Disability Definition

V D O E ’ s

3 Eligibility Criteria

V D O E ’ s

4 Exclusionary Criteria

L i s t V D O E ’ s c o n d i t i o n s t h a t m a y p r e v e n t t h e c h i l d f r o m q u a l i f y i n g .

5 Prevalence (K-12): Federal, Virginia, and assigned state – State whether your assigned state’s disability label is different/same as VDOE’s. – Describe similarities and differences in the data (3 – 5 sentences).

P r o f e s s o r w i l l a s si g n y o u r s t a t e ; l i s t p o s t e d o n M o o d l e .

6 &7 Impacts of Disability: (a) Learning/Academics, (b) Social-Emotional, and (c) Transition

A t l e a s t t h r e e i m p a c t s f o r e a c h c a t e g o r y .

8 &9 Instructional and Classroom Accommodations and/or Modifications Recommendations

A t l e a s t s i x r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s .

10 IEP Goals

[Order Now]

Disability Presentation Developmental Delay 12-slide presentation

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.