Digital Inclusion or Exclusion within Dallas City Paper

November 28, 2022

Digital Inclusion or Exclusion within Dallas City Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Digital Inclusion or Exclusion within Dallas City Paper

[Order Now]

The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with ways of assessing levels of digital inclusion or exclusion within a named community.

Review the following resource: https://www.dallasfed.org/cd/communities/2020/0914and respond to the needs assessment prompts as follows.
Describe the demographics of the community in which you currently live or one with which you are most familiar.
Respond to as many of the following questions as you can by using a variety of sources–including existing needs assessments–and your own knowledge of the community where applicable. [Cite all sources consulted.]

Who are the individuals that do not use broadband? What prevents them from accessing services? Is it lack of affordability? Or lack of neighborhood infrastructure? Or do they not see value in obtaining access?

What neighborhoods do individuals without broadband access reside in? What are the age groups? What is their income level? What are their ethnicities? Is their primary language different from English?

What level of digital skills do people have across the community? Are people interested in learning more about online safety, social media, online job pages or specific software?

What devices do people use to access the internet? Cell phones? Tablets? Computers? Do existing devices need to be changed or upgraded to meet their needs for broadband services?

[Order Now]

What internet service providers (ISPs) are in the area? What plans do they offer? At what speeds? How much do they charge?

If there are questions above that could not be answered by existing sources, comment on the importance of having such information readily available. What measures would you take to obtain answers to those questions.

Feel free to also include any graphic information to support your responses.

Digital Inclusion or Exclusion within Dallas City Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.