Demonstrate Reflexivity Throughout The Proposal

Demonstrate Reflexivity Throughout The Proposal

Instructions/Descriptions

Demonstrate Reflexivity Throughout The Proposal

[Order Now]

5. Reflexivity:

This means reflecting on key aspects of your

proposed study (i.e. reflect on why you chose one topic instead of another, or reflect on why

you chose one focus instead of another; reflect on why you worded your questions as you

have; reflect on your positionality and ability to conduct the research in the given timeframe,

necessary skills and resources needed to complete different aspects of this research (i.e.-

recruitment, ethics, data gathering, transcribing [if needed], analysis, writing, etc.).

-Reflect on issues of power, privilege and marginalization related to making knowledge about

this topic.

-Reflexivity is best demonstrated throughout the proposal as opposed to in its own section

[Approx. 1-2 pages]

3

6. Theoretical Frameworks:

-Explain the theoretical approach(s) you will use to help frame and analyze your study (i.e.

certain criminological theories, critical race theory, legal theory, queer theory, indigenous

epistemologies).

-Explain why the selected theoretical stance was chosen (i.e. how does it help us make sense of

your topic?) TIP: Identify the theoretical frameworks used in the existing literature and either

select one or more of those theoretical frameworks or identify a new framework that has yet to

be used in the existing literature.

[Approx. .5-1 page]

7. Ethics:

-Discuss the ethical dilemmas related to your project.

-Even if you are not conducting research with participants, you should still reflect on the

“small-e” ethics of your study.

-Be specific about potential harms and risks associated with your proposed project and how

you will mitigate and address them.

-Note: You do not need to complete or attach an ethics application.

[Approx. 1-2 pages]

8. Supporting Documentation (also known as an Appendix or Appendices).

-If you are conducting interviews/focus groups you will need to attach the following

appendices: Appendix A: Information sheet; Appendix B: consent forms; Appendix C: question

guide.

-You can find templates for Appendix A & B on Carleton University’s Research Ethics Board

website: https://carleton.ca/researchethics/forms-and-templates/. Download and modify these

forms for your own purposes.

-You will need to develop your own questions for the question guide (Appendix C).

[Order Now]

Format:

• The Research Proposal should be between 13-15 pages long (give or take .5 pg) (not including

cover-page, bibliography, and any appendices.

• Include the following on a separate title page: Our course code and name, your name, your

student number, the due date.

• You may use subheadings to identify different sections.
• You may re-use content from your previous two assignments (the Research Design

Assignment, and the Mini-Literature Review. Please note, however, that this content may need

to be revised, edited, and expanded based on feedback from me or the TA, as well as the

Research Proposal Assignment’s page guidelines.

• The assignment must be typed, double spaced, and in Times New Roman 12-point font or a

font of equivalent size.

• All margins must be standard (no excessive margins one way or the other; avoid double

spacing between paragraphs).

Demonstrate Reflexivity Throughout The Proposal

RUBRIC Excellent Quality 95-100%   Introduction 45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Literature Support 91-84  points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Methodology 58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. Average Score 50-85% 40-38 points More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. 83-76  points There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. 52-49  points The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Poor Quality 0-45% 37-1 points The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. 75-1 points There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. 48-1 points There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Demonstrate Reflexivity Throughout The Proposal Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

Demonstrate Reflexivity Throughout The Proposal

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!