Democracy and Revolutions History Paper

December 17, 2022

Democracy and Revolutions History Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Democracy and Revolutions History Paper

Democracy, Revolutions, History, Paper

What is Due by That Time: an essay between 500–700 words

What is the Essay?

Write an academic report on any of the following three (3) chapters in the textbook:

Chapter Three, “Of Wars and Revolutions”
Chapter Four, “The Constitution of a Nation”
Chapter Five, “A Democracy of Numbers”

The report will identity the overarching argument of that chapter in the first paragraph, explain how Jill Lepore develops that argument in the body of the paper, and articulate the significance of that argument in the conclusion.

In the body of the paper, please discuss what evidence contributes to the overarching argument, and how.
The “significance” paragraph is open-ended. It does not need to be long. In undergraduate essays, the concluding paragraph rarely exceeds half of a page. Be thoughtful here, however. How has reading this chapter advanced your understanding of US history? If you feel moved or shocked, why?

Trace concrete reasons behind feelings, and articulate those reasons. Unlike the introduction and the body, the “significance” in the conclusion paragraph is the only part in which you can bring “your ideas” into the essay; the rest is the accurate summary of what Lepore has accomplished.

This is not a research paper. No materials outside of the reading (textbook: These Truths).

More Important Stuff:

Appendix I includes writing conventions. Adherence to these conventions or not that will impact essay grades.

Appendix II clarifies how to format the essay, and what the expectations on citations are for this essay.

Appendix I: Writing Conventions

TITLE. All papers should have proper titles, including this one. The title should re-capture the essence of your thesis. Something like “Report on Chapter Three” is not counted as a substantive, and thus real, title.

PARAGRAPH. Paragraphs should be between three sentences and ¾ page. All paragraphs must have their topic sentences.

SENTENCE. One sentence shall only have one focus. Avoid massaging too much information into one sentence.

PARAPHRASING > DIRECT QUOTES. Be very judicious about selecting direct quotes from the textbook.

PASSIVE VOICE. Be specific and explicit on who did what.

USE STRONG VERBS. “Was, is, are, were, would,” are weak verbs. Find the action in your sentence, and bring that to the fore.

“CLARITY! CLARITY! CLARITY!” If some sentences, words, and structures are unclear, revise!

Appendix II: Formatting and Citation Rules

The paper should be typed in Times New Roman, 12 pt, double spaced, without any additional space between paragraphs.

Simplify the header information. Put your name and “HIST Paper #1” at the beginning, and that is it. No other information or cover page needed.

Citations

Please use in-text citations. Put (Lepore, PAGE NUMBER) following the completion of any sentence that includes direct quotes from the book.

Please do not add a bibliography page for this assignment, for all information comes from one source.

[Order Now]

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Democracy and Revolutions History Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.