Delinquency Sociology Multi-Part Question Discussion

November 28, 2022

Delinquency Sociology Multi-Part Question Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Delinquency Sociology Multi-Part Question Discussion

[Order Now]

I’m working on a sociology multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Sullivan relies heavily on the street corner theories and examples that Singer argues we need to break away from. Setting this debate aside, both books describe the variety of challenges youth experience while growing up, but in very different contexts. Given what you have read of Sullivan so far and considering our discussions of Singer, why is it important for delinquency researchers to study people AND places?

Design a Research Survey Questions Worksheet

Questionnaire Design Steps

Choose a topic and dependent variable. Start with a simple question that you want to know the answer to: “What do Cuyamaca students (or millennials, women, Americans, etc) think about _____________?”

Think of what questions you could ask in order to find out what people think about your dependent variable. Think of a number of different ways you could have people give their answers. Construct at least two measures of the dependent variable (two questions). Be as specific and objective as possible. Use closed ended questions (multiple choice with one choice possible, Likert scale (Links to an external site.), etc.).

Choose your independent variables (what causes the independent variable). Think about ways that your targeted group differs. They will most likely be demographic characteristics (race, age, sex, income, religion, education, location/residence, student/non student, etc.), identities, attitudes or opinions they hold, or something about their position in life/work. Select at least 6 of these as independent variables: characteristics of respondents that might shape their attitude towards your dependent variable.

Think about the best ways to get respondents to report these characteristics. Construct one measure for each of your independent variables. Be as specific and objective as possible. Use closed ended questions (multiple choice with one choice, Likert scale (Links to an external site.), etc.).

Write your hypothesis. Write a hypothesis about what you think is the likely answer to this research question. Remember, your hypothesis should testable and provable or falsifiable: you should be able to imagine different results that would “support” or “not support” your hypothesis. Your hypothesis should have an independent and dependent variable.

Construct your survey questionnaire. Construct a questionnaire that includes all of your measures of independent and dependent variables. Include several additional items in the questionnaire to make it less obvious what your research question is (and to make it less likely that your questionnaire format will bias the responses). Your questionnaire should have a minimum of 10 separate items/questions.

[Order Now]

Post your survey online and have at least five people take your survey. Ten would be even better.

Answer the questions for this assignment.

Some from survey software includes:

Google forms/survey (Links to an external site.)

survey moncky free account

Delinquency Sociology Multi-Part Question Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.