Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
I’m working on a sociology multi-part question and need a sample draft to help me learn.
Reading 6…..Moore maintains that psychological theories tend to explain crime and delinquency at the individual level. Do you agree with this assessment?
How does each of the groups of theories discussed (learning, IQ, personality, and cognitive and social development) explain crime? Reading 7.. Is psychopathy best thought of as something a person either is or is not, or is it better to think of psychopathy as traits existing along a continuum, with traits along the continuum varying in number and severity? Can psychopathy be both a category and a continuum?
Is psychopathy a tautology?
Are certain people, namely psychopaths, born criminals?
Explore a Professional Organization Discussion
Organizations Explore a PROFESSIONAL organization such as the National Council on Family Relations, American Association of Family and Consumer Science, the National Association for the Education of Young Children or any other organization that would benefit someone working in the field of children and families. Research the organization and provide the information outlined below. IMPORTANT NOTE: Please include the title of your organization in the title of your post. An organization may be reviewed only ONCE. You may not review an organization that has already been reviewed, an organization may only be reviewed once. You are encouraged to post early so that you can review the organization of your choice.
In two-three paragraphs: Explain the mission and purpose of the organization. Are there specific ethical positions stated? If so, how would those impact your working in the field? Is there a cost associated with the organizations?Do they offer professional development opportunities? Is it a research organization? How is that shown? Why would being a member of that particular organization be valuable to you in your career? Include a link to the organization at the end of your post so that others may view the resource if desired.
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/