Degree of integration of experience and reflective thinking

December 21, 2022

Degree of integration of experience and reflective thinking

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Degree of integration of experience and reflective thinking

[Order Now]

Description

Write a reflection paper addressing the following three questions:

1. What was the best part of the appreciative interview process for you – be it at as an interviewer or an interviewee? Why?

2. How did the appreciative interview format- rather than a “neutral” or critical interview – impact the unfolding relationship, the learning dynamics during the conversation, and choices in self-disclosure? Please be specific in your response.

3. Which connections do you see between your journal activities, your appreciative interview experience and developing intercultural communication flexibility in yourself and others? In responding to this question, please include relevant concepts from your readings and research.

800 -1000 words. Due by Sunday midnight. 20 points.

Evaluation criteria:

Writing: Please use APA style referencing format (citing material from the interview and/or your journal may be appropriate). Develop a well-structured paper with an introduction, main paragraphs, and summary. Use relevant independent research/readings on appreciative inquiry and appreciative interviews from at least two different sources, so that you can integrate this conceptual information with your paper structure and your reflections.

Content:

Quality of observations; relevance and quality of reflective thinking related to theory and specific experience of the appreciative interview process and appreciative methodology (questions 1 and 2).

Degree of integration of experience and reflective thinking with theory and concepts from the course readings to date; correct application of concepts to practice; scope and depth of insightful perspectives and expanded meaning created; self-awareness and maturity in views of self as a self-directed learner (question 3).

Grading Rubrics

Degree of integration of experience and reflective thinking

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.