Davis Socrates Soul Existence and Arguments Questionnaire

December 17, 2022

Davis Socrates Soul Existence and Arguments Questionnaire
Description
part 1
1. Explain the reasoning by which Socrates attempts to demonstrate that the soul exists after death (that it is not dissolved and scattered). (78b-80b)
2. What objection does Simmias raise to Socrates argument that the soul is not dissolved and scattered when it leaves the body? (85e-86d) What objection does Cebes raise? (86e-88b) [In each case, try to summarize in a sentence the alternative view proposed by the interlocutor.]
3. Socrates response to Simmias objection is in four parts. Explain them. (92e-95a)
part 2
1. What kind of explanation of how things come to be, perish or exist did Socrates first believe Anaxagoras would offer? What kind of explanation did Anaxagoras actually offer? Why was Socrates disappointed? (97b-99c)
2. Explain the manner of investigation Socrates uses. (99e-102a)
3. Explain Socrates response to Cebes objection. (102b-106e) [Try to follow each of the key moves Socrates makes. How does it all add up?]

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.