- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 757 528 8682
- support@standardwriter.com
Cyber Security within Homeland Security Project
Cyber Security within Homeland Security Project
|
Order Number |
636738393092 |
|
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
|
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
|
Format |
APA |
|
Academic Sources |
10 |
|
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Instructions/Descriptions
Cyber Security within Homeland Security Project
Cyber, Security, Homeland, Security, Project
Use the template attached!
IMPORTANT
Final Project must be at least 10 APA-formatted and referenced pages including title page and references.
DO NOT SUBMIT YOUR FINAL PROJECT TO YOUR PERSONAL TURN IT IN Account or through someone else’s account before you submit it under Week 8 Assignments.
Submitting YOUR FINAL PROJECT TO YOUR PERSONAL TURN IT IN ACCOUNT or using someone else’s Turn It In account will render your actual Week 8 submission ineligible for grading. It will generate 100 percent similarity (plagiarism) once (re)submitted under Week 8 Assignments.
In the Final Project, all listed sub-headings/sub-sections from the Final Project Content and Format must be included.
You can use the (attached) APA Paper Template or the Research Proposal Template. If you use the Research Proposal Template , in the subsections/subheadings from this course template under Research Design section you should state briefly in a paragraph or two, a method/technique you would use to conduct your own “field” research on the subject (survey, interview/s, statistical analysis, content analysis, etc.). You will have no time conduct actual field research.
In the Literature Review section, you should APA-review at least 10 peer-reviewed authors who wrote on the chosen subject in addition to primary sources (laws, regulations, convention, treaties and media sources). Wikipedia should not be used as a reference.
In the Methodology section, you should thoroughly explain how you plan to carry out the research to include research design, research strategy, data collection, data analysis, and researcher perspective.
Begin the paper with an introduction of your topic. An introduction has an attention getter, purpose or thesis statement, and an overview. An attention getter can begin with any of the 6 ways: (1) Anecdote, (2) Question, (3) Quotation, (4) Humor, (5) Shocking Statistic, or a (6) combination of them (http://classroom.synonym.com/5-types-attention-getters-essays-2877.html).
After you introduce the topic, state the purpose of the paper. The purpose can be as simple as restating the objective of the assignment. The purpose of this paper is to (state purpose). (Overview) The paper will address the following: (List topics)
First Main Point
This is the first main point. Please provide example to support your research or assumptions. Real world events, experiences, opinions based on research, conclusions based on research. Be sure to use in text citation (Dantzler, 2014).
Sub Topics if Applicable
Add sub topics if applicable and in text citation if applicable (Author, 2014).
Sub Topics if Applicable
Add sub topics if applicable and in text citation if applicable (Author, 2014).
Second Main Point
This is the second main point. Please provide example to support your research or assumptions. Real world events, experiences, opinions based on research, conclusions based on research. Be sure to use in text citation (Author, 2014).
Sub Topics if Applicable
Add sub topics if applicable and in text citation if applicable (Author, 2014).
Sub Topics if Applicable
Add sub topics if applicable and in text citation if applicable (Author, 2014).
Third Main Point
This is the third main point. Please provide example to support your research or assumptions. Real world events, experiences, opinions based on research, conclusions based on research. Be sure to use in text citation (Author, 2014).
Sub Topics if Applicable
Add sub topics if applicable and in text citation if applicable (Author, 2014).
Sub Topics if Applicable
Add sub topics if applicable and in text citation if applicable (Author, 2014).
Fourth Main Point (If Applicable)
This is the fourth main point. Please provide example to support your research or assumptions. Real world events, experiences, opinions based on research, conclusions based on research. Be sure to use in text citation (Author, 2014).
Sub Topics if Applicable
Add sub topics if applicable and in text citation if applicable (Author, 2014).
Sub Topics if Applicable
Add sub topics if applicable and in text citation if applicable (Author, 2014).
Conclusion
Conclusions wrap up what you have been discussing in your paper. After moving from general to specific information in the introduction and body paragraphs, your conclusion should begin pulling back into more general information that restates the main points of your argument. Conclusions may also call for action or overview future possible research. The following outline may help you conclude your paper:
In a general way,
- Restate your topic and why it is important,
- Restate your thesis/claim,
- Address opposing viewpoints and explain why readers should align with your position,
- Call for action or overview future research possibilities.
| RUBRIC | |||
| Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
| Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
| Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Cyber Security within Homeland Security Project
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Cyber Security within Homeland Security Project
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/
