- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 757 528 8682
- support@standardwriter.com
Cuy Philosophy If You Evaluate Someone What would be Required for an ABC Discussion
Cuy Philosophy If You Evaluate Someone What would be Required for an ABC Discussion
Description
Assignment 11Here is the second most doable discussion students will have in our course. As you know, all assignments are evaluated in a Pass/No Pass basis to eliminate the stress of earning exactly the grade you desire to earn as a final grade. The only graded assignment is the Exit Survey, which is an Applied Cumulative Questionnaire of the materials learned in this course. It will be released exactly one week before our course ends.
Students often ask, “What do you want for an A? B? C?” Over the years, it has become clear to me that students already know the answer to this question. In fact, when students are asked to evaluate each other’s work, they are often much tougher than teachers are.
Here is the prompt for this Discussion and only two posts are needed.
Many of you are experts in some area. I remember I loved inter-collegiate debate as a college student, and I could easily say who did a great job during a debate round and who had flubbed it. What are you an expert at? What are you good at?
Post 1: Share what you are an expert at. If you had to evaluate someone at that activity, what would be required for an A, B, or C? Make sure and explain your grading scheme to include style, content and the performer’s skill or comprehension, and anything else you find appropriate.
Post 2: Comment in a non-superficial way to a colleague’s post.
Both posts are due on Monday, March 15, with the usual 3 Day grace period.
Anddd
Go to our Syllabus and copy and paste the grading scheme here.
2. How does a student earn an A in our course?
3. How does a student earn a B in our course?
4. How does a student earn a C in our course?
5. What grade are you trying to earn in our course?
6. How many Homeworks (including this one), Discussions and Logic Journals have you completed? Are there any you need to redo for credit? List them here.
7. How many more in each category do you have to complete and pass in order to make your desired grade a possibility? What does it mean to pass an assignment?
8. What else must you do in order to achieve your desired grade?
9. How many weeks are left in our course?
10. When are Professor Yang’s Office Hours? Is an appointment necessary? How do you attend one? Can you call or text?
gra
Since achieving the actual percentages cannot happen here because of too few assignments, let us agree to the following for each grade range.
C: 3/5 Discussions (Introduction Discussion Counts!), 5/8 Homeworks, 2/4 Journals, Exit Survey Score 70%
B: 4/5 Discussions (Introduction Discussion Counts!), 6/8 Homeworks, 3/4 Journals, Exit Survey Score 80%
A: 5/5 Discussions (Introduction Discussion Counts!), 7/8 Homeworks, 3/4 Journals, Exit Survey Score 90%
| RUBRIC | |||
| Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
| Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
| Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Cuy Philosophy If You Evaluate Someone What would be Required for an ABC Discussion
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Cuy Philosophy If You Evaluate Someone What would be Required for an ABC Discussion
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/or
Cuy Philosophy If You Evaluate Someone What would be Required for an ABC Discussion
