Curriculum Based Assessment Design Assignment

January 2, 2023

Curriculum Based Assessment Design Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Curriculum Based Assessment Design Assignment

PLEASE READ EVERYTHING CAREFULLY, Let me know what you need!!!!

PLEASE LOOK AT THE ATTACHMENT BELOW

For the week 6 assignment, you are creating a pre assessment, and a summative assessment and administering both during a lesson. You are also asked to discuss what you created per the assignment

prompts for a lesson you created in weeks 3 and/or 4, and describe outcomes of the assessments, and data collected. You should describe how you used the data to inform instruction to support remediation, redirection and/or enrichment. If you cannot implement the pre assessment and summative assessment, then hypothesize outcomes, and discuss how you would use data to inform future

instructional practice. Be sure to follow the assignment directions completely to address the tenets of the assignment. Hope this helps.

Using what you’ve learned from Chapters Six and Eight from Lefrançois as well as other resources along the way, develop a curriculum based assessment (CBA) centered on one of your two instructional

plans from Weeks Three and Four.

Part 1: Provide a Pre-Assessment Description (One-pages).
Use these prompts to guide your exploration of what occurred BEFORE the summative assessment.

State measurable and observable objectives (what you wanted students to learn).

Describe how you knew learning occurred prior to summative assessment.

Describe the instructional strategies used to prepare students for the summative assessment (from your previous instructional plan in either Weeks Three or Four).

Explain adjustments you made or should have made to your instruction to ensure mastery of learning objectives.
Describe how the use of technology contributed to student preparation for the summative assessment or how it will be added to and contribute to the summative assessment here.

Part 2: Design an easily accessible summative assessment (Approximately two pages)

Identify the grade level and subject matter and a measurable unit objective(s) and align with the stated standard as prescribed in the original instructional plan from either Week Three or Four and referenced

from the Common Core State Standards Initiative . http://www.corestandards.org/
Create a minimum of six, no more than ten, problems/questions/tasks for students to complete that include a variety of test item types (selected response, short answer, extended written response, and/or

performance).
Label each question with its corresponding:
Objective(s) (if more than one is being assessed)
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) levels (Note at least two different cognitive levels must be measured on this assessment.)
Define and discuss criteria for scoring extended response and performance items.
Part 3: Provide Assessment Reflection (One pages).

Define how you determined mastery.
Explain how you will accommodate or modify for the special population previously described in Week Four (two students with specific learning disabilities in reading and math, one ADHD student, and one English language learner).
Describe how you will use the evidence collected.
Grading: You will submit a SINGLE document clearly labeled as Parts 1, 2, and 3. APA formatting will be followed, including the required cover and reference pages. You must use a minimum of five scholarly resources, in addition to the course text. Your resources should include a combination of peer-reviewed articles and web-based articles, and they must be cited in-text. You will be held accountable for each required subcomponent per part, viewable on the assignment rubric.

Curriculum Based Assessment Design Assignment

Writing the Final Project
The Summative Assessment:

Must be approximately eight double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
Must use at least five scholarly sources, in addition to the course text.
Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
➤TEMPLATE ALERT! The following link Week 6 Assignment Template Preview the documentwill give you access to a template that will help support your success in completing this assignment. The template will help you with APA formatting and the organization of your paper. It provides additional guidance to ensure you address all components of this assignment.

Curriculum Based Assessment Design Assignment

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

The link below is my teacher Grading Rubic

https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/12618/preview

Curriculum Based Assessment Design Assignment

[Order Now]

Curriculum Based Assessment Design Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.