Cultural Diversity Paper

February 1, 2023

Cultural Diversity Paper

Order Number	5647864546476434353
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Cultural Diversity Paper

In part 1

the student interviews a “client” using the Cultural Nursing Assessment Questions found in Module 03 of their Course Readings: Subjective Cultural & Spiritual Assessment. Obtain permission from the participant before this assessment and make sure they understand that they do not have to participate or answer any question that may be uncomfortable. You must follow Herzing University’s nursing program dress code for the interview. This can be a patient, a family member, neighbor, or other personal contact, but must be someone of a race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation that is different from the interviewer.

In part 2

the student must submit a typed summary of information gathered during the interview supported with in-text reference citations (min 2 pages typed). Summaries should be completed in APA format and uploaded to the

Canvas dropbox according to the published schedule.

In part 3

the student must reflect on how they think this knowledge might influence their nursing care with persons from different cultures (min 1 page typed). Reflections should be uploaded to the Canvas dropbox according to the published schedule.

In part 4

the student will present the assessment, their analysis, and their reflections (part 1-3) to the class in as part of a round-table discussion, and post a reflection of this experience in the provided Canvas discussion board.

Students will submit their answers to interview questions, summary of information from part 2, and reflection in a single paper written in APA format and uploaded to the Canvas dropbox according to the published schedule.

Part 1- Client Interview data:

Using the attached list of questions, the student will explore the client’s health beliefs as they relate to his/her cultural diversity. Previous students have found it helpful to review the literature before the actual interview to be better prepared for asking specific questions.

Part 2-Cultural Analysis and Health Care Needs Identification:

The student needs to summarize their interview findings using interview data and reference sources. At a minimum the following should be included:

Using the client interview data and current literature, describe the traditional cultural health care beliefs and practices, which include illness beliefs, and social structures.
Discuss any differences between what you’ve read in the literature regarding the culture’s traditional health and what your client told you. Include possible explanations for these differences.

Identify actual or potential health care problems/concerns (for example cultural, physical, psychological, social, financial, or developmental) for the client and cultural/diversity group.

Discuss potential therapeutic interventions for the client and /or cultural group that promote wellness and demonstrate respect for the client’s culture/diversity, rights, beliefs, values, and life experiences and that incorporate professional values and practice standards.

Record your observations from the interview regarding nonverbal and verbal communication (such as eye contact, rate of speech, personal space, and touch) demonstrated by yourself and the client.

Part 3 Personal Reflection:

Students need to reflect upon how their own culture and beliefs influence their nursing care and how knowledge gained from this assignment will influence future nursing care with clients from diverse cultures. At a minimum you should include the following:

Analyze how your culture (beliefs, values, religion, orientation, etc.) influences your nursing care.

To what extent do your beliefs, prejudices, or biases influence your thinking and nursing care? Give several examples.

Discuss specifically how the knowledge from this assignment will influence your future nursing care of clients from different cultures/orientations. Discuss several examples.

Part 4 Presentation:

Students will present their assessment data summary, analysis, and self-reflection in a round table discussion with their peers and reflect on this experience via a Canvas discussion board.

[Order Now]

Cultural Diversity Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.