Cultural conflict because of globalization

January 18, 2023

Cultural conflict because of globalization

Order Number	6536776536676876
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Cultural conflict because of globalization

Using your field of study and considering your future workplace (posible Public relations), describe an example of cultural conflict that has or could occur because of globalization. For example, if you are studying human resources, how would a company with international offices face challenges due to different cultural values?

For the assignment, you will describe the potential conflict; it may be one that you find in a news story or academic article. It may be a scenario you experienced or one you envision could happen in your professional field. Next, analyze the causes of the conflict and consider three ways that globalization could lead to conflict in your future workplace.

Consider the Hofstede theory of cultural dimensions as you write your causal evaluation, along with the various cultural differences and sources of cultural conflict discussed in the Units 3 and 4 readings.

You will need to reference and cite concepts from a source from sources below about cultural conflict and cite at least one additional credible source related to your field of study. The essay should be no less than 3 pages in length (not counting the title and references page) and follow APA guidelines for formatting and citations. Paragraphs should be well-developed and edited for clarity and correctness.

Sources:

Cosman, O. (2021). Cultural differences in business communication. USV Annals of Economics & Public Administration, 21(1), 78-87.

Evans, A., Suklun, H., & Nunn, S. (2017). Workplace diversity and intercultural communication: A phenomenological study. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1).

Giang, T. & Tian, K. (2018). Cross-cultural business communication: An anthropological approach toward diminishing geographic borders. In C. Maheshkar & V. Sharma (Eds.), Handbook of research on cross-cultural business education (pp. 183-199). IGI Global.

Meyer, E. (2015). When culture doesn’t translate. Harvard Business Review.

Winters, M. F. (2017). We can’t talk about that at work!: How to talk about race, religion, politics, and other polarizing topics. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. [Read chapter 1, 20 pages]

Cultural conflict because of globalization

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.