CSUN Sociology Referencing And Citing Information

November 29, 2022

CSUN Sociology Referencing And Citing Information

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

CSUN Sociology Referencing And Citing Information

[Order Now]

For this Discussion Forum, I want us to begin digging into our experiences or opinions with complex concepts such as racial & ethnic stereotyping, white privilege, and gender & sexual discrimination.

The questions for this forum are based on the following chapters, the links to which are also available on the Module Content: Week 5 page:

Chapter 11 (specifically sections 11.2 and 11.3) (Links to an external site.)

Chapter 12 (Links to an external site.)

Questions

Define “stereotypes”, referencing and citing information from Chapter 11. Then, offer at least 2 examples of everyday racial and/or ethnic stereotyping. Now, in your opinion, why do these stereotypes persist? Consider who or what gains from maintaining these social constructions of interpersonal and institutional power.

What is white privilege? After outlining this concept with supporting references from and citations to Chapter 11, offer at least 2 examples of white privilege. Finally, in your opinion, do you believe you benefit from white privilege? Why or why not?

[Order Now]

Differentiate between “sex” and “gender”. Then, answer the following: a) how does gender and sexual discrimination harm all individuals (both normative and non-normative identities/expressions)? and b) offer at least 2 real-world consequences for any individual exposed to gender and sexual discrimination over an extended period of time. Please reference and cite information from Chapter 12 to support your answer.

Directions

Answer questions #1-3 listed above.

CSUN Sociology Referencing And Citing Information

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.