CRJ320 Mod 1 CT Habilitation and Rehabilitation in Juvenile Justice Essay
Order Number
|
967893092 |
Type of Project
|
ESSAY
|
Writer Level
|
PHD VERIFIED
|
Format
|
APA
|
Academic Sources
|
10
|
Page Count
|
3-12 PAGES
|
Instructions/Descriptions
CRJ320 Mod 1 CT Habilitation and Rehabilitation in Juvenile Justice Essay
[Order Now]
Habilitation/Rehabilitation in Juvenile Justice
Much scholarly debate has centered on the basic ideology of rehabilitation in juvenile justice. However, rehabilitation is not always our focus. When we are determining best-practice approaches to juvenile reformation, the focus should be on “habilitation.” Dictionary.com (2021) defines “habilitation” as “the act of becoming fit or of making fit for a particular purpose.” The criminal justice system makes the assumption that justice-involved juveniles were fostered in a thriving environment consisting of love and safety. However, many juveniles began experiencing trauma in utero and in the early stages of critical brain development. Many juveniles have experienced trauma in the form of abuse, violence, neglect, abandonment, and/or poverty at birth, thus never having the privilege of connection and belonging, proper education, and the ability to trust others. Their experiences have impacted proper brain development critical for higher-order cortical development (Moreland & Ressler, 2021).
[Order Now]
Rehabilitation focuses on providing programming to return to a prior state of self. As an example, a 35-year-old man who never used drugs became addicted to opiates after a recent surgery. Rehabilitation will help him gain the skills to rebuild back to the life he once knew. Habilitation is trauma-informed care that is prepared to help juveniles build their skills of self-efficacy and esteem and support emotional and prosocial development (Moreland & Ressler, 2021).
Examine the juvenile justice system in terms of historical aspects of rehabilitation of juveniles and the current shift to habilitation.
- What types of programs could be found during the “Progressive Era” of the 1920s?
- What vocations were trained for in the reform schools in America?
- Who made up the majority of delinquents in these training programs? What was the impact of these training programs on youth and society?
- How do the programs and juvenile system of the “Progressive Era” compare with your current understanding of juvenile programs and systems today?
- What is the shift from rehabilitation to habilitation and why is this shift critical to our current day Juvenile Justice System?
Your paper must meet the following requirements:
- Your written paper should be 2-3 pages in length not counting the title and reference pages, which you must include.
- Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings.
- Cite at least three scholarly sources for this assignment. Scholarly resources include: peer-reviewed journal articles, books, the class textbook, or reports/documents from the government (.gov sites). A scholarly source does not include general sources from the internet (.com, .org, .edu, and .net sites are not scholarly). Scholarly resources should be current (no older than five years). If the class textbook is used as a source, then two other scholarly sources must be used.
- The CSU Global Libraryis a great place to find resources.
- Your paper must be formatted according to CSU Global Writing Center.
- If you need assistance with your writing style, start with the Writing Help section of the CSU Global Writing Center.
- [Order Now]
Review the grading rubric to understand how you will be graded on this assignment. Reach out to your instructor if you have questions about the assignment. Prior to posting, proof read your submission for clarity, grammar, punctuation, and APA.
References:
Dictionary.com. (2021). Habilitation. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/habilitation
Moreland, A. & Ressler, K. (2021). A perspective for understanding trauma and the criminal juvenile justice system: Using a trauma-informed lens for meaningful and sustained change. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 29 (3), 216-222.
Rubric
CRJ320 Mod 1 CT
CRJ320 Mod 1 CT |
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements |
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
12 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
9 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
6 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
|
15 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent |
10 to >5.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of juvenile justice; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. |
5 to >4.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge about juvenile justice. |
4 to >3.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge about juvenile justice. |
3 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis |
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides strong or adequate thought, insight and analysis of concepts and applications about juvenile justice. |
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis about juvenile justice. |
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis about juvenile justice. |
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples |
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. |
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. |
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. |
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. |
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. |
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. |
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. |
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style |
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error. |
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors. |
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors. |
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCRJ3202 – Identify the major U.S. Supreme Court cases that have shaped critical issues and practices in the juvenile justice system. Identify the major U.S. Supreme Court cases that have shaped critical issues and practices in the juvenile justice system. |
5 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of theory; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. |
4 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. |
3 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. |
2 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials |
|
5 pts |
Total Points: 70 |
PreviousNext
CRJ320 Mod 1 CT Habilitation and Rehabilitation in Juvenile Justice Essay
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!