Critical Thinking Sociology Discussion

November 29, 2022

Critical Thinking Sociology Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Critical Thinking Sociology Discussion

[Order Now]

Learning Goal: I’m working on a sociology discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Critical Thinking Questions

Assessment: Generalist social workers select intervention strategies

based on the assessment of client system needs and the preferences of

the clients and constituencies. What practice knowledge and skills are

needed to carry out these assessment activities?

Assessment: Social work roles define the direction for professional

activities, and the corollary intervention strategies activate practice

roles. As related to assessment activities, what common elements or

themes are evident in the various roles and strategies associated with

the function of consultancy for problem solving?

Diversity and Difference in Practice: Information is power! Draw on

MacIver’s description of power as knowledge- the know-how, know-

what, know-when, and know-where–to explain the purpose of

engaging clients as experts of their own experience.

[Order Now]

Research-Informed Practice: There is an increasing emphasis on

developing best practices and employing evidence-based

interventions. How can social workers fully achieve the professional

expectation to contribute to the knowledge base of practice through

their research and scholarship role?

Critical Thinking Sociology Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.