Order Number |
653547567453457 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY/DISERTATION |
Writer Level |
PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED |
Format |
APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD |
Academic Sources |
10 -20 |
Page Count |
4-8 PAGES |
CRITICAL THINKING ENG 103 DEBREIFING
What you probably noticed during the Transnational Capital Auction was therace to the bottom cartoon showing “corporate
America” firing a racing gun while people labeled U.S. workers, Chinese workers, and Haitian workers prepare to race down a
staircase where there’s a devil at the finish line What you probably noticed during the Transnational Capital Auction was the “race to the bottom.” Various countries underbidding each other can quickly lead to selling out the workers and enabling pollution. The alternative–losing the auction–would mean no jobs for anyone. “Winning” ends up exploiting your own workers. It really
seems
like a no-win situation. To reflect on the Transnational Capital Auction, please answer the questions below.
FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS
could a family supplement its income?
3.Consider some of the ideas that are presented as obvious & absolute in the media: Is corporate investment always a good thing? Create a chart listing benefits & harmful effects of investment.
other down?
5.Who benefits & who doesn’t benefit from the “race to the bottom?” How could people in various countries get together to
stop attacks on their social & environmental conditions?
6.What could we do in the U.S. to respond to the global “race to the bottom?
7.” Look over your auction “bids” – on minimum wage, worker organizing, taxation rates, & environmental laws. If Capital were to accept your “bid” & come to your country, what would be the real human & environmental consequences here?
Explain in detail.
8.Based on your experience with the auction, agree &/or disagree with the following statement & back up your answer with
evidence: Poor countries need investment, so it’s a good thing when transnational companies invest there.
9.The global process that we simulated in class is sometimes called “downward leveling” or the “race to the bottom.” What, if
anything, could people in poor countries do to stop this race to the bottom?
10.One company used to manufacture all of its products in the U.S., paying wages that averaged (with benefits) around $16 an hour. The investment director for this company now travels every month to places like Indonesia, El Salvador, & Nicaragua
looking for sites to produce his company’s products. He says that he would prefer to keep all production in the U.S. Based on
this simulation & what you know, why do you think this person’s company feels forced to send production to countries that have a lot of “Friendly-to-Capital” points?
11.What impact does the face to the bottom have on workers in this country? In what ways might it affect your lives?
In answering the question, you might think about the three quotes below: “It is not that foreigners are stealing our jobs, it is that we are all facing one another’s competition.” William Baumol, Princeton University economist “Downward leveling is like a cancer that is destroying its host organism – the earth & its people.” Jeremy Brecher & Tim Costello, Global Village or Global Pillage “Globalization has depressed the wage growth of low-wage workers [in the U.S.]. It’s been a reason for the increasing wage gap
between high-wage & low-wage workers.” Laura Tyson, former Chairperson, U.S. Council of Economic Advisers
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/
CRITICAL THINKING ENG 103 DEBREIFING