Critical discussion of cost controls

December 20, 2022

Critical discussion of cost controls

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Critical discussion of cost controls

[Order Now]

Description

Please write a paper on the following topic:

Provide a critical discussion of one important information technology that, in your opinion, allows foodservice managers to better control their costs. It can be any generic type of technology (for example, you can talk generally about point of sale systems) or a specific hardware or software (for example, Partender, which is a nice inventory control system). Some guiding questions may include:

How can this information technology help managers better control their costs?

What are some examples of benefits that this information technology offers managers to better control their costs?

What are some areas of foodservice (e.g., purchasing, receiving, production, service) in which you think information technology may help improve operations and cost control?

What could be some popular technologies for the consumers that would help managers improve operational performance and keep costs under control?

Hint: I have seen technologies like HotSchedules (optimizing labor management) OpenTable (optimizing dining room utilization) and a variety of Point of Sale systems (e.g., Lavu, Aloha) that have outstanding capabilities for cost control and management. For more information, please review the last set of slides, Chapter 100 Technology tools.

References page: If you use references, you should include a way for the reader to access the works you used.

If you cite websites, please make sure the links work. Writing style: Use the APA style. No usage of the first person. No definitions (except for technical terms unknown to the general public).

No need to copy/paste the guiding questions from above into your assignment.

Critical discussion of cost controls

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.