CRIM 495 Past Present and Future of FARC

CRIM 495 Past Present and Future of FARC Essay

Instructions/Descriptions

CRIM 495 Past Present and Future of FARC Essay

[Order Now]

This section is extremely malleable in that groups can include as much, or as little detail as needed to clarify what remains to the reader (e.g., stakeholder). However, this section needs to elucidate your group’s policy recommendations for responding to the issue or phenomenon you have researched, and specifically, how. This will be rooted in the data you analyze and present. In order to complete this section, you will also need to present your results. This means, analyzing your data according to your proposed Methodologies in Week 4.

For many of you, this is a simple quest (e.g., descriptive statistics, frequency distributions, etc.). Tables, graphs, charts, etc. will all be presented in this section alongside what has been done to address these groups/movements and what should be done. If you need more help in contextualizing all of this jargon, please watch the “Data and Analysis” mini-lecture in the “Group Project” folder. Basically, this is a data-driven analysis. Some of you will dedicate your analysis the group or movement (e.g. growth/decline/etc.) and others will focus on the impact of prior policy decisions and whether those policies were effective at curbing the terrorism you are examining (and why or why not). Regardless, you must propose solutions to the group, phenomenon, or issue you examined.

These solutions must be clear, specific, and measurable. If the movement/group examined is no longer prevalent (i.e. has fragmented, dissolved, etc.), what should have been done to address this movement/group more effectively at the time? The more creative and nuanced this section is, the easier it will be for groups to distinguish themselves from others. To be successful here, however, will require groups to adequately research what has been done before to address the phenomenon in question (see Literature Review submission).

If something has been tried and has been a failure, then do not recommend it as a viable policy recommendation. If something has failed, but research has shown how this failure can be ameliorated in future policy, then be specific in recommending what can be done in similar veins. This also means that groups will need to rely on evidence-based practices in crafting specific policy or program responses to the phenomenon. Hence why you need to rely on your data to inform your decisions here. Complex problems often require multidimensional solutions. Please think long and hard about what you think would actually work and why in terms of addressing the movement, group, or phenomenon you are studying.

[Order Now]

The submission in question, at a minimum, will include the following information:

• What does your data show as to the nature of the problem(s)/group(s) examined?

o Over time?

o Now?

o After certain policies were implemented?

• What needs to be done in terms of policy, program, or practice?

o If the movement/group examined is no longer prevalent (i.e. has fragmented, dissolved, etc.), what should have been done to address this movement/group more effectively? ▪ Be specific here.

This submission will also include any and all graphs, charts, plots, tables, and figures you create. It is expected that various forms of visuals be used to display your analyses.

CRIM 495 Past Present and Future of FARC Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!