Order Number |
65376563475645454 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY/DISERTATION |
Writer Level |
PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED |
Format |
APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD |
Academic Sources |
10 -20 |
Page Count |
4-8 PAGES |
Crafting a Compensation and Benefits Plan
Please include one citation from attached course text. Citation: Youssef-Morgan, C. M., & Stark. E. (2020). Strategic human resource management: Concepts, controversies, and evidence-based applications.
Include one citation for article Herzberg’s two factor theory: Citation: Futureofworking. (n.d.). Herzberg theory of motivation in the workplace Links to an external site.. Retrieved from https://futureofworking.com/herzberg-theory-of-motivation-in-the-workplace/
Article Citations:
Gallup. (2014, September 22). State of the American workplace: Employee engagement for U.S. business leaders Links to an external site.[Report]. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/services/176708/state-american-workplace.aspx
Lipman, V. (2013, September 23). Surprising, disturbing facts from the mother of all employee engagement surveys Links to an external site.. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/victorlipman/2013/09/23/surprising-disturbing-facts-from-the-mother-of-all-employee-engagement-surveys/
Instructions:
Now that you have considered how to recruit and retain the employees you want in your organization, create a compensation and benefits package using the business proposal format in the Assignment Outline (attached file). The package must be consistent with the objectives of job satisfaction for the valuable employees in an organization of your design.
Include the following:
Salaries and benefits packages of comparable organizations in the same industry.
What employees working in the 21st century consider to be benefits (see this week’s recommended readings for a start).
What helps to keep employees engaged in their work (see State of the American workplace: Employee engagement for U.S. business leaders (https://www.gallup.com/services/176708/state-american-workplace.aspx) and Surprising, Disturbing Facts from the Mother of All Employee Engagement Surveys (https://www.forbes.com/sites/victorlipman/2013/09/23/surprising-disturbing-facts-from-the-mother-of-all-employee-engagement-surveys/) for some ideas)
Please review the Word 2010 create and edit tables video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZCaA5Z7MN8). Closed captioning and transcript of the video is provided in the tool bar of the video player.
Your business proposal must be formatted according to APA style
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/