Course Project Task II Annotated Bibliography

November 24, 2022

Course Project Task II Annotated Bibliography

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Course Project Task II Annotated Bibliography

[Order Now

Short Paper/Case Study Analysis Rubric

Requirements of submission: Short paper assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. Page length requirements: 1-2 pages undergraduate courses; 2-4 pages graduate courses.

Refer to this link for viewing and printing Turnitin paper feedback.

Instructor Feedback : Students can find their feedback in the grade book as an attachment.

Critical Elements

Distinguished

Proficient

Emerging

Not Evident

Value

Main Elements

Includes all of the main elements and requirements and cites multiple examples to illustrate each element

(23-25)

Includes most of the main elements and requirements and cites many examples to illustrate each element

(20-22)

Includes some of the main elements and requirements

(18-19)

Does not include any of the main elements and requirements

(0-17)

Inquiry and Analysis

Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of multiple concepts

(18-20)

Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of some concepts

(16-17)

Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of minimal concepts

(14-15)

Does not provide in-depth analysis

(0-13)

Integration and Application

All of the course concepts are correctly applied

(9-10)

Most of the course concepts are correctly applied

(8)

Some of the course concepts are correctly applied

(7)

Does not correctly apply any of the course concepts

(0-6)

Critical Thinking

Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples

(18-20)

Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence

(16-17)

Draws logical conclusions, but does not defend with evidence

(14-15)

Does not draw logical conclusions

(0-13)

Research

Incorporates many scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research

(14-15)

Incorporates some scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research

(12-13)

Incorporates very few scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research

(11)

Does not incorporate scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research

(0-10)

Writing

(Mechanics/Citations)

No errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations

(9-10)

Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations

(8)

Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations

(7)

Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations

(0-6)

Module 3 Assignment 1: Course Project Task II/Annotated Bibliography

During Module 2, you identified four journal empirical articles related to your research question. In this module, select two more articles related to your topic, totaling to six sources by this module that you would have gathered.

For the first assignment this module, select two of those six sources and using the guidelines provided on the Module 3-page 2 lecture page, create the annotated bibliographies of the two sources and submit to the M3A1 drop box. Each annotation must be no longer than 150-200 words.

This submission will automatically be reviewed by Turnitin software. You will receive an Originality Report for matching text sections that have been flagged by the software. Review the handouts in DocSharing to understand how to interpret the Turnitin report accurately.

As you revise, make sure you have cited your sources accurately and also paraphrased the original material in your own words.

Once the revision is complete, submit to the M3: Assignment 1 Dropbox, byFriday, May 23, 2014.

Name your file W7000_M3_A1_lastname_firstinitial.doc.

All written assignments and responses should follow APA style in formatting and attributing sources.

[Order Now

Please make sure you review the elements of the grading criteria and associated points carefully and make sure your assignment has addressed all the elements and, in enough detail, to merit full points.

Assignment 1 Grading Criteria	Maximum Points
Provided reference entries for the two selected sources using APA format.	4
Summarized briefly in 2-3 sentences the author’s research purpose, methods, and key findings. Identified each article as a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods study.	4
Evaluated the quality, credibility, and reliability of the sources.	8
Reflected on each annotation’s relevance to the research topic/research questions and potential use as part of final literature review.	8
Displayed accurate APA Style and format (including the Title page) by presenting information in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrating ethical scholarship with accurate in-text citations and references; displaying accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.	4
Reviewed the Originality Report in Turnitin and corrected citations, if required, especially use of direct quotes, with appropriate quotation marks, as well as accurate paraphrasing of original material.	4
Total:	32

For assistance with any problems you may have when completing this assignment—OR—to offer your assistance to classmates, please use the Problems and Solutions Discussion area located through the left side navigation link.

Course Project Task II Annotated Bibliography

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.