Correlates of Drug Use Case Study Discussion

November 28, 2022

Correlates of Drug Use Case Study Discussion

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Correlates of Drug Use Case Study Discussion

[Order Now]

For your post, you should discuss in detail how the film reflects (or does not reflect) your readings about social correlates of crime. In doing so, consider all of our readings on correlates but also think back to the Musto and Gusfield piece you read during week 2 as you may be able to make some connections about how the use of performance enhancing drugs (i.e., steroids, beta blockers) are symbolic of some social factors or structural issues.

In your initial post be sure to use quotations from the film and readings to clearly demonstrate the connections you are making.

Film: Bigger, Stronger, Faster (Documentary)

Readings:

Use atleast 3 of the readings from the powerpoint I have uploaded. Thank you! 🙂

Helping a Client Discussion

Today is your first meeting with Amanda, a female teenage client. Her parents referred her to your agency for skill-building, specifically communication and coping skills. She is an only child and her parents are divorced, which reminds you a lot of your family situation when you were growing up. Amanda is fairly shut down in your first meeting, unwilling to engage in much conversation or even the ice breaker activities that you put together. When you ask her why she doesn’t want to work with you, she says that no one understands what she is going through.

Instructions:

In a minimum of two pages (not counting the title page and reference page), address the following:

[Order Now]

Part 1: Explain.

Compare and contrast the difference between helping a client vs. saving a client. Where does self-disclosure fit?

Discuss the ethical issues and challenges related to self-disclosure in the human services field.

Incorporate one (1) library resource to support and/or defend your thoughts. Cite the source you use.

Part II: Reflect.

Consider the above scenario. How would you respond to Amanda? Would you choose to disclose your own experiences? Why or why not? Defend your answer. Be specific.

Correlates of Drug Use Case Study Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.