Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Variables

February 9, 2023

Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Variables

Order Number	65363737383
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Variables

WRITING REQUIREMENTS: The essay should be 7-9 pages. APA formatting should be used throughout (cover page, running header, major heading, subheadings, in-text citations, and reference list). Any time you paraphrase or directly quote a source, in-text citations should be used. A full APA-formatted reference should be included at the end of the assignment. The essay should include the following subheadings: Definitions Conceptualizes race Operationalizes race Census Bureau changes How changes to variables affect conclusions Reflection INSTRUCTIONS: Make sure to follow the directions in order. First, provide a definition of the terms: “conceptual definition” and “operational definition”. Next, conceptualize and operationalize the variable “race.” Read the Census Bureau’s report on race. Answer the following questions after reading the report: What changes did the Bureau make to the conceptualization and operationalization of race in the 2010 census? Why did the Bureau make these changes? Could the difference in operationalization produce different conclusions about race? Does the Bureau’s conceptualization and operationalization of race coincide with yours? If so, how? If not, what is different?

constructivism and feminism

Second Exam Spring 2023 Both constructivism and feminism are examples of postmodernist approaches to international relations. In a comprehensive essay: Explain postmodernism. Cite the lectures, the text, and Michael Shapiro’s article to assist you in in your discussion of postmodernism. Then explain the constructivist paradigm. Include in your essay key concepts such as narratives, identity, what constructivists consider to be the objects of study in IR, the importance of discourse, language, and its relationship to power, as well as socialization. Cite the lectures, the text, and Sarina Theys’ article to assist you in your explanation of constructivism. How does constructivism differ from realism? What do they hold in common? Finally, explain feminism and its critique of IR theory, especially its critique of realism. Include in your essay key concepts such as gender, socialization, and “flavors” of feminism. Cite Judith Ann Tickner’s article on feminism and the “What do Sweden and Mexico Have in Common?” article. What do you like about these paradigms? Why do you? Explain what weaknesses they have, if any. Do these approaches to IR convince you that realism and/or liberalism are not helpful in understanding how the world works? Explain why you think so.

The text is : Karen Mingst and Ivan Arreguin-Toft. Essentials of International Relations. ISBN: 9780393441703 Ninth Edition (New York: W.W. Norton & Company)

[Order Now]

Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Variables

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.