Conceptual Paper Feminist Perspective in Social Construction

February 3, 2023

Conceptual Paper Feminist Perspective in Social Construction

Order Number	65345643334574
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Conceptual Paper Feminist Perspective in Social Construction

One Source MUST be the textbook. I will upload images. Here are the instructions and the rubric. My instructor is really big on readings. Please dicuss in the essay

MicroAgrression and Women

Social Constructionism

Social Work Values

Feminisist Role in Oppression

Why understanding gender role is important to the social work profession

Conceptual Paper 15 pts Choose a conception addressed in the readings to define, explore, explain and juxtapose to social work’s mission and praxis (Competency 1, 2, 3)

Objectives: 1) To reflect on ideas about traditional history and multicultural perspectives 2) To integrate personal awareness of the intersectionality of the diverse components of multicultural history, experiences and social justice concepts, Values, knowledge and skills 3) To demonstrate critical thinking* elements in writing: • Ability to frame issue • Ability to consider context • Ability to communicate position • Ability to analyze evidence • Ability to integrate perspectives • Ability to articulate implications

The first conceptual paper (6-8 pages) should use the required readings and demonstrate understanding and critical thinking of a major concept discussed. It includes your feelings, reactions and impressions of the course material and reflections on social, economic and environmental justice. It should contain at least five sources that were published between 2010-2023. APA features to remember include a title page, page numbers, section headings and reference page.

Rubric: Conceptual Paper 15 Points Exceeds Standards Meets Standards Below Standards C2 : Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice 15 points Analysis of course material from a social and economic justice perspective, demonstrates sophisticated critical thinking skill*s as demonstrated by use reflection to highlight self-regulation to manage personal values and maintain professionalism in practice situations. Analysis recognizes structural dynamics (macro) and individual, family and community (micro, mezzo) influences. Discussion conceptualizes the intersectionality of components. Incorporates more than 75% of readings from weeks 1-5. Analysis of course material from a social or economic justice perspective meets basic critical thinking* skills as demonstrated by use of 70%-75% of the required readings, integration of 3 – 4 elements and recognizes structural dynamics. Analysis does not demonstrate understanding of social values, integrate critical thinking elements or recognize structural dynamics of oppression. Graduate Level Writing: grammar and mechanics Organization Conceptual Clarity 5 points possible Uses graceful language and APA format that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error-free. Uses language and APA format that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing includes some errors. Uses language that often impedes meaning because of many errors in usage. Total 15-13 12-10 Below 9

[Order Now]

Conceptual Paper Feminist Perspective in Social Construction

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.